Guten Tag Matthew Bluhm,
am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 um 23:57 schrieben Sie:
> The repository was started 5 1/2 years ago.
Which version does your repo has and which Subversion does your server
use? Did you just upgrade your repo or made a full dump and load cycle
with current versions of Subv
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag olli hauer,
> am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 um 22:45 schrieben Sie:
>
>> Someone hacks one of the additional mirrors, modifies a revision and adjust
>> the
>> checksum (as described on many places how-to fix a corrupt repo) so
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Matthew Bluhm wrote:
> There were some binary files that were included as part of the projects that
> weren't necessary, so its tons of seemingly small mistakes.
>
> The repository was started 5 1/2 years ago. Revision #6,000 was about 2
> years ago. I have never
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Thorsten Schöning
> wrote:
> > Guten Tag olli hauer,
> > am Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 um 22:45 schrieben Sie:
> >
> >> Someone hacks one of the additional mirrors, modifies a revision and
> >> adjust t
olli hauer writes:
> Is there a way to dump the checksums from a svn repo?
>
> What I'm doing at the moment on masters and slaves is
> $> svnadmin verify
> and
> $> sqlite $repo/db/rep-cache.db "select hash,revision from rep_cache"
>
> then additional comparing the sqlite output from master and s
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
>> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily
>> get stored the same way, does it?
>
> I think in 1.8/fsfs it will byte-for-byte identical. (except
> rep-cache.db, but you can remove that file without cons
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
> >> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily
> >> get stored the same way, does it?
> >
> > I think in 1.8/fsfs it will byte-for-byte ide
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +:
>> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>>
>> > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
>> >> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily
>> >> get stored the same way, does it?
>> >
>> > I think in 1
Philip Martin writes:
> mkdir zz
> echo foo > zz/f
> echo bar > zz/g
> echo zigzig > zz/F
> echo zagzag > zz/G
> svnadmin create repo
> svn mkdir -mm file://`pwd`/repo/A
oops! should be import not mkdir
svn import -mm zz file://`pwd`/repo/A
> svnadmin create repo2
> svnsync init file://`pwd`
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 19:13:11 +:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +:
> >> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> >>
> >> > Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
> >> >> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't
Daniel Shahaf writes:
>> Further, node-revision-ids can vary for other reasons. Representations
>> in the revision files are in whatever order the client sends
>> representations to the server. There are no defined orders for clients
>> to use so it is quite likely that commits to the master an
On 2012-11-29 20:13, Philip Martin wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
>> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:26:04 +:
>>> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>>>
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:59:47 -0600:
> But, the copy built by svnsync doesn't necessarily
> get stor
On 2012-11-29 19:24, Philip Martin wrote:
> olli hauer writes:
>
>> Is there a way to dump the checksums from a svn repo?
>>
>> What I'm doing at the moment on masters and slaves is
>> $> svnadmin verify
>> and
>> $> sqlite $repo/db/rep-cache.db "select hash,revision from rep_cache"
>>
>> then ad
Hello everybody. I followed arch-linux wiki guide for setting up a SVN
repository using apache and ssl. I'm almost certain, that I understand all
the steps, and that I filled them correctly. Here is the guide:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Subversion_Setup. When I try to
connect using
I am sorry to re-visit this again.
Yes, we have cases where files (in the same path, i.e. trunk/docs) are intended
for different releases. If as you say, we are doing something wrong, what's a
better way to handle this?
In /trunk/docs:
Release_doc_1.5
Release_doc_1.6
Release_doc_1.7
"Do yo
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 18:24:38 +:
> olli hauer writes:
>
> > Is there a way to dump the checksums from a svn repo?
> >
> > What I'm doing at the moment on masters and slaves is
> > $> svnadmin verify
> > and
> > $> sqlite $repo/db/rep-cache.db "select hash,revision from
16 matches
Mail list logo