Re: Cleanup needed after failed update

2012-06-16 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Justin Case, am Samstag, 16. Juni 2012 um 03:33 schrieben Sie: > Please guys, don't keep using the word "locks" then throwing it > back at me: I'm NOT EXPERIENCING LOCKS, just a regular file being in > use in Windows. Calm down, there's more than one type of a lock and just because you

Re: Cleanup needed after failed update

2012-06-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 01:55:18AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > There is also a 1.6 bug: > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4196 > > that removes locks that should remain. > > I think it is likely that Justin is seeing the buggy 1.6 behaviour. In > some circumstances this

Re: Cleanup needed after failed update

2012-06-16 Thread Justin Case
- Original Message - > From: Stefan Sperling > > AFAIK open files cannot be deleted on Windows. So either the file was closed > at the time the 1.6 wc log was run, or the 1.6 wc log failed to actually > update the on-disk data. No no no :) neither nor. 1.6 just tested the file _before_

Re: Cleanup needed after failed update

2012-06-16 Thread Simon Large
Johan Corveleyn gmail.com> writes: > 'svn cleanup' removes any working copy locks, and runs whatever is > left in the work_queue, thereby returning the working copy to a valid > state. > > BTW, the work of moving the file into place has some sort of > "retry-loop", where it keeps retrying for a c