Avoinding file handle leak using the Python bindings & core.Stream

2012-04-16 Thread Willmer, Alex (PTS)
Hello, I've been working on an full text search plugin for Trac. At initial setup this indexes the entire Subversion repository by reading every node of every version. During testing we discovered that the indexer was running out of file handles, due to a file handle leak. As far as I can tell

Re: Avoinding file handle leak using the Python bindings & core.Stream

2012-04-16 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 16.04.2012 11:29, schrieb Willmer, Alex (PTS): > I've been working on an full text search plugin for Trac. Nice! ;) > At initial setup this indexes the entire Subversion repository by > reading every node of every version. During testing we discovered > that the indexer was running out of file

'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Kuno Meyer
Is it by design that 'svn cleanup' ignores externals and that there is no way to include them? I found it a bit inconsistent that 'working copy' has different meanings for 'svn update' and 'svn cleanup'. Kuno $>svn help update update (up): Bring changes from the repository into th

Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31:33 +: > Is it by design that 'svn cleanup' ignores externals and that there is no way > to > include them? > You should be able to include them by naming them explicitly: % svn cleanup path/to/external/dir > I found it a bit inconsistent that

RE: Feature request: inhibiting checkout for tags and branches

2012-04-16 Thread Paul Coulson
I don't have apxs and can't find a 64 bit version. Seems like I would also need Perl. Is there a Windows 64 pre-compiled version of mod_dontdothat? Paul Coulson Software Engineer Email:pcoul...@senscient.com A2 Arena Business Centre, Holy Rood Close Poole Dorset BH17 7FJ Tel:+44 (0) 1202

RE: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de] > Sent: 16 April 2012 12:49 > To: Kuno Meyer > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals > > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31:33 +: > > Is it by design that 'svn cl

AW: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-16 Thread Becker, Thomas
Hi Stefan, Thanks for the new release! From the list of changes for 1.6.18 I learned that the server side performance of "log -g" was improved (r1152282). This sounds particularly interesting for our setup. Does a similar fix exist in 1.7.4, too? Regards, Thomas This email and its attachm

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-16 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Becker, Thomas wrote: \ > Thanks for the new release! From the list of changes for 1.6.18 I > learned that the server side performance of "log -g" was improved > (r1152282). This sounds particularly interesting for our setup. Does a > similar fix exist in 1.7.4, to

Re: Avoinding file handle leak using the Python bindings & core.Stream

2012-04-16 Thread Alex Willmer
Ulrich Eckhardt dominolaser.com> writes: > Am 16.04.2012 11:29, schrieb Willmer, Alex (PTS): > > To work around this I have monkey patched a > > Stream.close() method that calls svn_stream_close, which is used > > in a try/finally block. > > Disclaimer: I'm not really familiar with the SVN/Python

Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Kuno Meyer
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:48:45 +0300: > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31:33 +: > > Is it by design that 'svn cleanup' ignores externals and that there is > no way to > > include them? > > > > You should be able to include them by naming them explicitly: > > %

Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 16:51:29 +0200: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:48:45 +0300: > > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31:33 +: > > > Is it by design that 'svn cleanup' ignores externals and that there is > > no way to > > > include them? > > > > >

Implementations of an SVN/DAV aware proxy?

2012-04-16 Thread Tim Watts
Hi, Anyone know if there is a workable SVN/DAV proxy that exists that can handle the protocol enough to make all the translations required between differing old/new URIs? Why? We're changing SVN servers from mod-dav-svn to SCM-Manager - and one minor fly in the ointment is the sty

Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2012/4/16 Daniel Shahaf : > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 16:51:29 +0200: >> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:48:45 +0300: >> > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:31:33 +: >> > > Is it by design that 'svn cleanup' ignores externals and that there is >> > no way to

Re: Implementations of an SVN/DAV aware proxy?

2012-04-16 Thread Lorenz
Tim Watts wrote: >[...] >We're changing SVN servers from mod-dav-svn to SCM-Manager - and one >minor fly in the ointment is the style of our old repo URI, which was of >the form: is there a reason you can't just use 'svn relocate' on the working copies? -- Lorenz

Re: 'svn cleanup' ignores externals

2012-04-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Thanks for the pointers, Konstantin. I've promoted the bug to 1.8-consider. (It's not a release blocker.) Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 03:02:23 +0400: > 2012/4/16 Daniel Shahaf : > > Kuno Meyer wrote on Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 16:51:29 +0200: > >> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 16