Feature request: Easy tree conflick resolve mechanism

2012-04-13 Thread Sune Fischer
Hi, In the old days the .svn folder was in every folder and resolving a tree conflict was as easy as deleting the conflicting folder and doing an update. This solved 90% of our issues. This is no longer possible as the only the .svn is now at the root of the whole project! I assume there are s

Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I have not upgraded to Subversion 1.7 yet. I'm still on 1.6.17. One reason is that there is a script I like to use, that I wrote, called svntwdiff. It goes like this: $ cat svntwdiff #!/bin/bash if [ -z "$1" ]; then echo "usage: $0 " exit 1 fi FILE="$1" FILEDIR="$(dirname "${FILE}")"

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 13.04.2012 10:55, schrieb Ryan Schmidt: > "twdiff" is a command-line wrapper that comes with the GUI > TextWrangler editor; it opens the two given textfiles in TextWrangler > and lets me view and edit the differences between files. I often use > svntwdiff to examine changes in a file and selecti

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:55:34 -0500: > I have not upgraded to Subversion 1.7 yet. I'm still on 1.6.17. > > One reason is that there is a script I like to use, that I wrote, called > svntwdiff. It goes like this: > > > $ cat svntwdiff > #!/bin/bash > You could use #!/bin

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:55:34 -0500: > >> How can I modify this script to be compatible with a Subversion 1.7 >> format working copy? > > 1.7-specific, relies on implementation details: > `svn info`[Working Copy Root Dir]`/

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > 1.x-compatible: > > use 'svn cat' to obtain a tempfile. > > That's a good idea. It sounds like this would be less work and > automatically backward- and future-compatible. Indee

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: >> >> On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >>> 1.x-compatible: >>> use 'svn cat' to obtain a tempfile. >> >> That's a good idea. It sounds like this would be less work an

Re: Feature request: Easy tree conflick resolve mechanism

2012-04-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:27:15AM +0200, Sune Fischer wrote: > Hi, > > In the old days the .svn folder was in every folder and resolving a > tree conflict was as easy as deleting the conflicting folder and > doing an update. This solved 90% of our issues. > This is no longer possible as the only

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:28:41 -0500: > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: > >> > >> On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> > >>> 1.x-compatible: > >>> use 'svn cat' to obtain a te

RE: Feature request: Easy tree conflick resolve mechanism

2012-04-13 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Sune Fischer [mailto:suneprogram...@gmail.com] > Sent: vrijdag 13 april 2012 10:27 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Feature request: Easy tree conflick resolve mechanism > > Hi, > > In the old days the .svn folder was in every folder and resolvin

svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place

2012-04-13 Thread Andrew Sasak
svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place on the server and the --incremental option is not used. The message returned is "authorization failed". This does not occur when the --incremental option occurs. The svnrdump command is version 1.7.2.

Re: svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
When --incremental isn't used svnrdump tries to dump the full tree and runs into the authz restrictions. Do you have a suggestion for an alternative behaviour? Andrew Sasak wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:58:50 -0400: > svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place on the > server

Re: svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place

2012-04-13 Thread Andrew Sasak
When --incremental is used, dump records all changes that the user has access to. When --incremental is used, I think dump should dump the whole tree that the user has access to. I can imagine that this would be a non-trivial change for an uncommon use case. On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Daniel

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-13 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.6.18. > Cool. I got 1.6.17 in the pipeline for Repoforge publication, and I can build and test this minor release for RHEL compatibility. It'll take a few hours for all the environme