Re: Questions about importing data into the Subversion repository on a WINDOWS 2003 Server platform

2012-02-27 Thread Lorenz
Anastasio, David M CTR USAF AFMC ESC/HNID wrote: >I have installed Apache Subversion on a Windows 2003 Server desktop, >along with the TortoiseSVN client. >[...] >My question is how to use the subversion import utility to place my >source files under source code control. TSVN comes with documentat

Re: Options for moving large files between repos

2012-02-27 Thread sebb
On 26 February 2012 21:52, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 07:52:41PM +, sebb wrote: >> On 26 February 2012 16:05, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/tools/client-side/svnmucc >> >> Is this available for all OSes? > > Yes. Things in

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

2012-02-27 Thread Jason Wong
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > The output from these two tells me two things: > > 1. The minfo-cnt value is reasonable (within a typical ballpark). > That's relevant since minfo-cnt abnormalities were seen in another > instance of the bug. > > 2. Everything else looks

Memory leak with externals

2012-02-27 Thread kmradke
All, Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client? We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals. When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory. When checked out with a 1.7 client it uses >1.5GB of memory. Same memory issue

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

2012-02-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:36:39AM -0800, Jason Wong wrote: > This is true. We have seen the bug happen before. The first occurence > of this that we had seen was Dec. 7th, 2011, a few days after we went > from 1.6.16 to 1.7.1. That was the first time we had seen that happen. > At the time, we did

Re: Memory leak with externals

2012-02-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:04:59AM -0600, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > All, > > Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using > svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client? > > We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals. > When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB

Re: Memory leak with externals

2012-02-27 Thread Philip Martin
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes: > Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using > svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client? > > We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals. > When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory. > When checked out with a 1.7 client it

Re: Memory leak with externals

2012-02-27 Thread kmradke
> > Has anyone else noticed a client memory leak when using > > svn:externals in the 1.7.3 client? > > > > We have a large project with tens of thousands of externals. > > When checked out with a 1.6 client, it uses 150MB of memory. > > When checked out with a 1.7 client it uses >1.5GB of memory. >

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

2012-02-27 Thread Jason Wong
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:36:39AM -0800, Jason Wong wrote: >> This is true. We have seen the bug happen before. The first occurence >> of this that we had seen was Dec. 7th, 2011, a few days after we went >> from 1.6.16 to 1.7.1. That was

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

2012-02-27 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:25:00PM -0800, Jason Wong wrote: > So I think I misunderstood why the error messages were occurring. > I had thought that there was a condition done by this check (in 1.7), > that was erroneously causing svn to reject the attempt to check-in. The purpose of this error is

Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

2012-02-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 03:18:35 +0100: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 03:25:00PM -0800, Jason Wong wrote: > > I guess I am wondering that if this is the case, then why is it that > > if the check-in fails, and then we manually check it in again using > > tortoisesvn, that it works

Question: merge info is no updated after merge

2012-02-27 Thread GENG, DAPENG (DAPENG)
Hello, I recently discovered that merge info does not get updated after merge. I've tried several times from one branch to taget branch. And merge info remains unchanged. In target branch, there are existing merge info for previous merges. No more new merges are recorded since few weeks ago.

Re: Question: merge info is no updated after merge

2012-02-27 Thread Stephen Butler
On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:24 , GENG, DAPENG (DAPENG) wrote: > Hello, > > I recently discovered that merge info does not get updated after merge. > > I’ve tried several times from one branch to taget branch. And merge info > remains unchanged. > > In target branch, there are existing merge info