Re: script or tool to walk back thru 1 file's history diffing..

2011-09-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:06 AM, wrote: > Would like to write a script to follow the history of a single > file, backwards, diffing the file w/it's prior version all the way > back to the 1st version. > > By using 'svn info' to get the last chgd rev, and running 'svn > diff -c $lastchgd_rev ...',

Re: Anyone able to produce Solaris binaries of 1.7.0-rc2 ?

2011-09-09 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:31 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Is there anyone on this list able to produce binaries of 1.7.0-rc

Re: script or tool to walk back thru 1 file's history diffing..

2011-09-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:44:06AM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:06 AM, wrote: > > Would like to write a script to follow the history of a single > > file, backwards, diffing the file w/it's prior version all the way > > back to the 1st version. > > > > By using 'svn in

Re: Searching in SVN

2011-09-09 Thread Prabhu Gnana Sundar
On Friday 09 September 2011 12:04 PM, Waseem Shahzad wrote: Hi guys! I would like to search a file amongst 1000+ files within a Folder. Is there any way to do this with smart way. svn ls -R | grep Regards Prabhu

RE: Searching in SVN

2011-09-09 Thread Waseem Shahzad
Thanks What we want to same in Tortoise SVN? Muchas Gracias, Waseem Bukhari CM - Ext: 331 From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar [mailto:prabh...@collab.net] Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 7:09 AM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Searching in SVN On Friday 09 September 2011

Re: How to migrate just part of a repo to another server

2011-09-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, Les, > > Von: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] >> >> 2011/9/7 Thorsten Schöning : >> > >> >> Would it work to start the dump at the revision of the move to the >> >> current path (without --incremental) if I'm willing to lose t

"svn revert --depth=files"

2011-09-09 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, In a working copy, "svn delete" a directory which contains files. Then do "svn revert --depth=files path/to/directory". As far as I can remember, this did revert the directory as well as the deleted files in SVN 1.6. It only reverts the deleted directory in SVN 1.7, leaving the files marked

Re: "svn revert --depth=files"

2011-09-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
--depth=immediates properly reverts all children of the deleted directory. Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 14:06:21 +0200: > Hi, > > In a working copy, "svn delete" a directory which contains files. > > Then do "svn revert --depth=files path/to/directory". > > As far as I can remem

AW: "svn revert --depth=files"

2011-09-09 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Daniel, It even is more strange: If I do "svn revert --depth=files foo/bar foo", then only the directory foo is reverted, and the file bar is not restored. Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > > --depth=immediates properly reverts all children of the deleted directory. But

Re: "svn revert --depth=files"

2011-09-09 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Markus Schaber wrote on Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 14:20:28 +0200: > Von: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > > > > --depth=immediates properly reverts all children of the deleted > > directory. > > But this also restores sibling directories to the file I want to > restore, right? Of cour

AW: "svn revert --depth=files"

2011-09-09 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Von: Markus Schaber [mailto:m.scha...@3s-software.com] > It even is more strange: If I do "svn revert --depth=files foo/bar foo", > then only the directory foo is reverted, and the file bar is not restored. This also displays no warning that foo/bar is ignored. In addition, if I do "svn re

Re: 1.7.0 upgrade doesn't properly follow svn:externals

2011-09-09 Thread Neels J Hofmeyr
On 09/08/2011 06:21 PM, Scott Palmer wrote: > Just tried 1.7.0RC2 and noticed that bugs with svn upgrade are still present. > > If you have svn:externals in the top level of your working copy they seem to > be converted, but if those external references also use svn:externals then > those nested w

cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread David Carson
We have a repository that is seriously cluttered with the svn:mergeinfo property. I don't believe we ever used the buggy 1.5.x versions that added the property erroneously (although I could be wrong). However, due to a lax policy regarding where merges should occur, the property is now attached t

Re: cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:17:15PM -0400, David Carson wrote: > To that end, I installed 1.7.0-rc2 with a snapshot of our repository, so I > could experiment and see for myself. I did a simple merge from one branch > to another. I was disappointed to see that the same miscellaneous group of > fil

test email message....

2011-09-09 Thread Bob Archer
...this should be bounced, I can't seem to send to the list. I am sending this to get a bounce so I can forward it to IT. Sorry if this gets to the list, if it does, please ignore. BOb

RE: cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread Bob Archer
> We have a repository that is seriously cluttered with the svn:mergeinfo > property.  I don't believe we ever used the buggy 1.5.x versions that added > the property erroneously (although I could be wrong).  However, due to a lax > policy regarding where merges should occur, the property is now at

Re: cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread David Carson
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:17:15PM -0400, David Carson wrote: > > To that end, I installed 1.7.0-rc2 with a snapshot of our repository, so > I > > could experiment and see for myself. I did a simple merge from one > branch > > to another.

Re: problems with propset svn:ignore

2011-09-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
Please keep idscussion on the mailing list by using Reply All. My reply below: On Sep 9, 2011, at 08:17, Randy Paries wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> >> svn:ignore is for ignoring unversioned files that you do not want to commit >> to a repository. >> >> If

Re: cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:00:53PM -0400, David Carson wrote: > OK, so let's try again. I've merged a change from another branch, which is > a commit with a single file changed. The result is much better, but let me > verify that I understand my results: > - file a/b/c/foo.c shows the file change

Re: cleaning up mergeinfo using svn 1.7

2011-09-09 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:40:11AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > It would help if you could present examples where elision does not > work for you, so we can fix 'svn merge'. The following quote from https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mergeinfo.h provides

customizing svnserve for svn+ssh

2011-09-09 Thread Matthew Beals
I have two sets of repos setup... common repos and user repos. On the machine acting as the svn host, I have the common repos stored in /repos while the user repos are in /home//.repos/ I'm attempting to simplify svn+ssh access such that: svn+ssh:///Code/some_project_reposerves up /re

Re: Searching in SVN

2011-09-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Sep 9, 2011, at 06:16, Waseem Shahzad wrote: > What we want to same in Tortoise SVN? If you want to learn how to do things with TortoiseSVN, you'll have to ask in a TortoiseSVN support venue. This list is for the base Subversion software only -- the official command line program and librarie