On Feb 22, 2011, at 01:27, Thomas STEININGER wrote:
> Ok - you mean that i start a script that iterates over all files and within
> over all revisions of the repository
> and execute on it your command.
No, just iterate over all revisions. As you've said before and again below,
you're not goi
[ Please do not top-post on this list, i.e. put your reply inline or
below the thing you're replying to. Also, if possible, use plain-text
email. More below ... ]
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Thomas STEININGER
wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf
> > Thomas STEININGER wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 07:39:4
On Feb 22, 2011, at 6:54 , Rick Varney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am introducing Subversion into our development environment. We are using a
> lock-modify-unlock stategy for all of our files. I do not claim this is the
> best or most efficient way to use Subversion, but it best fits the mindset
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:54:12PM -0800, Rick Varney wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am introducing Subversion into our development environment. We are using a
> lock-modify-unlock stategy for all of our files. I do not claim this is the
> best or most efficient way to use Subversion, but it best fits
Hi Experts!
I have read out a lot for Subversion 1.7 ; Can
you guys share when does it release for us?
Thanks
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely
for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended r
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:43:25 +0100:
> So, all that being said, what Daniel means is that you could apply
> something like:
>
> svn propedit --revprop -r $REV --editor-cmd 'perl -pi -e
> "s/\\xfc/\\xc3\\xbc/g"'
>
> to all revisions (REV) that need to be corrected (eit
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:26:25 +0200:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:43:25 +0100:
> > So, all that being said, what Daniel means is that you could apply
> > something like:
> >
> > svn propedit --revprop -r $REV --editor-cmd 'perl -pi -e
> > "s/\\xfc/\
Hello all,
Could anyone please explain a little on the following feature?
Specifically, my questions are
* How it affects the current subversion (1.6) features and performance
* This way makes svn git-like :), my first impression is that:
subversion will be distributed, not centralized :)
Cen
On Tuesday 22 February 2011, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> I have read out a lot for Subversion 1.7 ; Can
> you guys share when does it release for us?
Take a look at Subversion's roadmap.
Uli
--
ML: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html
FAQ: http://subversion.apache.or
On Tuesday 22 February 2011, Nguyen Vu Hung (VNC) wrote:
> Could anyone please explain a little on the following feature?
> Specifically, my questions are
>
> * How it affects the current subversion (1.6) features and performance
Not at all.
> * This way makes svn git-like :), my first impression
Guten Tag Ulrich Eckhardt,
am Dienstag, 22. Februar 2011 um 11:18 schrieben Sie:
> SVN has one .svn directory in every (versioned) child directory of a working
> copy. This has the effect that every child directory of a working copy is
> itself a working copy. SVN 1.7 wants to centralise this, i.e
Je serai absent(e) à partir du 02/19/2011 de retour le 02/27/2011.
I will be out of the office
I am off, picking up e-mails only occasionnally
For all important issues please reach directly:
For Synapse : Patrice Canchon
For OPTIME : Optime Dev Eu (Raphael Glaizaud- Chant Mouradian)
For Fibex :
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:54:05AM +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Ulrich Eckhardt,
> am Dienstag, 22. Februar 2011 um 11:18 schrieben Sie:
>
> > SVN has one .svn directory in every (versioned) child directory of a working
> > copy. This has the effect that every child directory of a w
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: 22 February 2011 09:34
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Thomas STEININGER; Stephen Connolly; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Re: Antwort: Re: problem with mutated vowel in
> log-message-contents
>
If the structures are being changed then would there be any impact on
existing Working copies or structure in SVN? I am working on Windows
Environment ; please advice precautions and advices accordingly.
Regards
Waseem
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent:
Tony Sweeney wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:52:09 -:
> Which is why you should probably use iconv(1) or any of the APIs listed here:
>
> http://www.unicodetools.com/
>
+1 to iconv.
In reality, the editor-cmd.sh script will check whether the log message
(which, again, will be argv[1]) is i
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:55:48PM +0500, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> If the structures are being changed then would there be any impact on
> existing Working copies or structure in SVN? I am working on Windows
> Environment ; please advice precautions and advices accordingly.
You can find advice in t
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:27:24 +0100:
> In particular note these two sections:
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#code-to-read
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#patches
> I found those two very valuable when I star
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:32:24PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:27:24 +0100:
> > In particular note these two sections:
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/general.html#code-to-read
> > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-g
>
> > I am trying to write a hook to prevent deletion of elements through a
> pre-commit hook.
>
>
> >>If you're not using the bindings you'd want svnlook, probably svnlook
> diff.
>
> >>But, do you really want such a hook? If a user has permission to add
> stuff they should be allowed to also
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 15:10:57 +0100:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:32:24PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:27:24 +0100:
> > > In particular note these two sections:
> > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/gener
I'm having trouble with single-file externals, and I suspect this is a
bug in svn rather than in my setup.
The file externals work fine except for one thing: they cause svn to
see my checkout incorrectly as a mixed-revision checkout. If I do a
clean checkout, and type "svnversion", instead of seei
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 15:10:57 +0100:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:32:24PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:27:24 +0100:
>> > > In particular note these two sections:
>
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 09:52:05AM -0500, Jason Sachs wrote:
> I'm having trouble with single-file externals, and I suspect this is a
> bug in svn rather than in my setup.
>
> The file externals work fine except for one thing: they cause svn to
> see my checkout incorrectly as a mixed-revision che
Hi,
I am trying to build the Perl bindings in subversion-1.6.2. The version
is old because I want to add the Perl bindings to the existing svn
installation.
I configure the subversion with the --with-swig=/path/to/swig option.
Then I get a lot of errors during 'make check-swig-perl':
... .
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:23:04PM +, Yudong Sun wrote:
> I can fix the first libgfortran.so.3 not found error by adding the
> path to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> ./subversion/bindings/swig/perl/native/Makefile.
>
> What about the following 'Can't locate loadable object for module
> SVN::_Repos'
Hi SVN mailing list! I'm a first timer with SVN and am having problems.
I followed this simple howto:
http://www.tonyspencer.com/2007/03/02/setup-a-subversion-server-in-4-minutes/
Now I have a repo setup that is accessible from remote clients. I can
checkout the repo files, edit any of the fil
> The problem with reintegrate merges you are describing sounds
> quite serious and should be added to the issue tracker.
I had recently submitted it (but didn't know about posting to this list first).
See http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3816
> Can you share more information t
>> If you could write a script that starts with an empty repository, gets a
>> working copy, and runs svn commands until the problem triggers, that would
>> help greatly (and avoids any ambiguity in the problem description!).
>
> See attached python script (tested only on WinXP + Python 2.6.5)
>
S
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:58, Christopher D Haakinson
wrote:
> Hi SVN mailing list! I'm a first timer with SVN and am having problems.
>
> I followed this simple howto:
>
> http://www.tonyspencer.com/2007/03/02/setup-a-subversion-server-in-4-minutes/
>
> Now I have a repo setup that is accessible
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 04:04:36PM +, Yudong Sun wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote, On 22/02/2011 15:47:
> >On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 03:23:04PM +, Yudong Sun wrote:
> >>I can fix the first libgfortran.so.3 not found error by adding the
> >>path to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH in
> >>./subversion/bindin
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:07:38AM -0500, Jason Sachs wrote:
> >> If you could write a script that starts with an empty repository, gets a
> >> working copy, and runs svn commands until the problem triggers, that would
> >> help greatly (and avoids any ambiguity in the problem description!).
> >
>
Hmm, a merge attempt isn't that hard, here's another script that does
that, and has the same problem.
We don't use local file repositories, but this has the same symptom as
w/ a remote server.
hope it's either an easy fix or an easy workaround...
--Jason
import subprocess
import os
def getDirAs
> hope it's either an easy fix or an easy workaround...
...or that it's something wrong with my setup and not a bug after all.
Jason Sachs wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:07:38 -0500:
> >> If you could write a script that starts with an empty repository, gets a
> >> working copy, and runs svn commands until the problem triggers, that would
> >> help greatly (and avoids any ambiguity in the problem description!).
> >
> > S
Jason Sachs wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:36:45 -0500:
> Hmm, a merge attempt isn't that hard, here's another script that does
> that, and has the same problem.
>
> We don't use local file repositories, but this has the same symptom as
> w/ a remote server.
>
> hope it's either an easy fix or
> svn: Unrecognized format for the relative external URL 'blah.txt'.
> 4
> ]]]
>
> I'm not sure what causes this, but for reference here's the output of
> 'svn help propset' from trunk:
I had to use "blah.txt -r 3 ^/foo/trunk/blah.txt" rather than "-r 3
^/foo/trunk/blah.txt blah.txt" as it would
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Could you use "#!/usr/bin/env python" as the first line please?
>
> Also, the script should rm -rf repos working w_foo w_bar, to make it
> re-runnable.
>
I can't seem to automatically delete the directoriesk (either by "rm
-rf" or python's
I've read lots of tutorials on setting up and importing projects into SVN
and the majority of them use file:/// so maybe it's just a matter of choice
on how to import your project.
As for my issue, the solution is this:
Delete the contents of /svn/scripts and then checkout a working copy from
S
Jason Sachs wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:02:55 -0500:
> > svn: Unrecognized format for the relative external URL 'blah.txt'.
> > 4
> > ]]]
> >
> > I'm not sure what causes this, but for reference here's the output of
> > 'svn help propset' from trunk:
>
> I had to use "blah.txt -r 3 ^/foo/tru
Shall we trade version info?
I'm running on WinXP SP3, with svn command line from Wandisco
binaries, svn version 1.6.15 (r1038135) compiled Nov 25 2010, 16:55:30
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Having fixed that (the fix was to use "--" in argv), I get this output
> with
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Daniel creo Haslinger <
creo-23985-subvers...@blackmesa.at> wrote:
> I am not sure if it is proper behavior to ignore a whole file instead
> of a single misconfigured line.
>
> Of course there might be some reason to do this I'm not aware of,
> but I can't think o
Recent trunk on Debian.
Jason Sachs wrote on Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 16:04:24 -0500:
> Shall we trade version info?
>
> I'm running on WinXP SP3, with svn command line from Wandisco
> binaries, svn version 1.6.15 (r1038135) compiled Nov 25 2010, 16:55:30
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Daniel
Many thanks for the replies on this. I now feel fully clued in.
Best regards,
Rick
44 matches
Mail list logo
