RE: crash report

2010-10-10 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: lieven.govae...@gmail.com [mailto:lieven.govae...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Lieven Govaerts > Sent: vrijdag 8 oktober 2010 19:59 > To: Wolff, Dave > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: crash report > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Wolff, Dave w

Re: Can Subversion work well with very large data sets?

2010-10-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > It sounds like your main problem is local operations in the working > copy (i.e. disk i/o). > Could you do another evaluation of Subversion when we start issuing > beta releases of Subversion 1.7 probably at the end of this year? > We're tr

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 10/9/10 12:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Yeah, both Subversion and SSH share the flaw of *ALLOWING* such >> unprotected keys to be stored locally, with no special command line >> arguments or special settings, and impossible to compile

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, jehan procaccia wrote: > Le 09/10/2010 20:40, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : >> >> svn+ssh is the most secure, but it conflcts with your desire for LDAP >> access. The SSH keys normally live under a single user's account, the >> user who owns the repository, who hsould

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-10 Thread Les Mikesell
On 10/10/10 3:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On 10/9/10 12:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Yeah, both Subversion and SSH share the flaw of *ALLOWING* such unprotected keys to be stored locally, with no special command line arguments or spe

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-10 Thread jehan procaccia
Le 09/10/2010 15:39, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Bob Archer wrote: The client should be able to store the credentials if you have it set up to do so. On windows/mac it is encrypted with OS included libraries. For Linux you need to set up gnome keyring or

Re: some confusion about subversion

2010-10-10 Thread Richard England
On 10/09/2010 09:23 AM, 肖晗 wrote: I am just new to subversion and encountered some confusion. I have set up a svn server on my ubuntu/linux. After creating an account called "test" under /var/svn(using svnadmin create /var/svn/test), I checked out the repository under "/home" directory. And all

Re: svn Farm

2010-10-10 Thread jehan procaccia
Le 09/10/2010 20:40, Nico Kadel-Garcia a écrit : svn+ssh is the most secure, but it conflcts with your desire for LDAP access. The SSH keys normally live under a single user's account, the user who owns the repository, who hsould have a locked password. You see why this conflicts with LDAP based

Project announce: svn-graph-branches

2010-10-10 Thread Olivier Mengué
This an initial announcement for my new Subversion-related project: svn-graph-branches This tool parses the Subversion log of a repository to generate a graph of the important events of the project: tag/branches creation/deletion and their revisions. Here is an example picture: http://svn-g

svnserve+sasl+pam

2010-10-10 Thread Marco Schuster
Hi, I want to authenticate SVN users against the local machine accounts; the system is Debian Testing. But every time a user tries to authenticate, he gets: svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Authentication error from server: SASL(-13): user not found: no secret in database What's going on

Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Tech Geek
All my repositories live under /var/lib/svn/. Let's the output of the following command (on the SVN server): # svn changed /var/lib/svn/projectA/ is A PartA/tags/DEV-1.00_RC5/ Now in my post-commit hook I need the following value in a variable (say EMAIL_URL): EMAIL_URL=/var/lib/svn/projectA/Pa

Re: Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 10, 2010, at 21:34, Tech Geek wrote: > All my repositories live under /var/lib/svn/. > > Let's the output of the following command (on the SVN server): > # svn changed /var/lib/svn/projectA/ > is > A PartA/tags/DEV-1.00_RC5/ > > Now in my post-commit hook I need the following value in

Re: Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Tech Geek
> > I assume you mean to also pass "-t $TXN" to svnlook in there somewhere. > Yes. I just copied the command from the shell prompt although I noticed that svnlook command works just fine without the "-t $TXN" argument inside the post-commit hook. > Or are you asking if there's a simpler way? Yes

Re: Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Daniel Becroft
--- Daniel Becroft On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Tech Geek wrote: > All my repositories live under /var/lib/svn/. > > Let's the output of the following command (on the SVN server): > # svn changed /var/lib/svn/projectA/ > is > A PartA/tags/DEV-1.00_RC5/ > > Now in my post-commit hook I ne

Re: Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Tech Geek
Daniel, >That is not possible for SVN to determine, as it does not know *how* you are serving the repository (HTTP, HTTPS, svn+ssh, svn, >etc). $REPOS will give you the physical path to the repository, not necessarily the publicly accessible path. That not a problem. I can always prefix the protoco

Re: Better way to get the full rule of the last commit?

2010-10-10 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 10, 2010, at 22:37, Tech Geek wrote: >> That is not possible for SVN to determine, as it does not know *how* you are >> serving the repository (HTTP, HTTPS, svn+ssh, svn, etc). $REPOS will give >> you the physical path to the repository, not necessarily the publicly >> accessible path. >