on an NTFS
volume.
BTW, it seems svn and NTFS don't play nice:
http://superuser.com/questions/15192/bad-ntfs-performance, and this is easy
to demonstrate by comparing the lock/unlock performance on NTFS against a
FAT-formatted disk. Do the new format working copies in 1.7 fix this?
cheers
Seems to work perfectly! Thanks Daniel, that's exactly what I was looking
for.
jamie
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/usage-of-svn_wc_diff-tp30399137p30445649.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:59:16PM -0800, JamieEchlin wrote:
>
> Daniel, thank you very much for that, that's incredibly helpful. It
> definitely gives me somewhere to start.
Hope, you'll be able to solve your problem. Here's a script that's a bit
more clean than the previous one. I haven't teste
Daniel, thank you very much for that, that's incredibly helpful. It
definitely gives me somewhere to start.
cheers, jamie
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/usage-of-svn_wc_diff-tp30399137p30413850.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:39:28AM -0800, JamieEchlin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Firstly I hope this is the right forum, it doesn't seem appropriate for the
> dev forum.
>
> Has anyone got an example of using svn_wc_diff (or 2/3/4 etc), preferably
> from python? I can find zero examples on the interwebs
[ Please don't delete all context and quotes messages. ]
JamieEchlin wrote on Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 07:39:32 -0800:
>
> Cheers, but I was trying to avoid using the svn executable, as I said I can't
> rely on it being present.
>
Then use the API equivalent...
> The trouble with the 41-line doc s
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/usage-of-svn_wc_diff-tp30399137p30406478.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
;m trying to do, which is
> basically property diffs.
>
svn diff --depth=empty **/
?
(where the shell expands **/ to "all directories under the current
directory"; find(1) could be used instead of this syntax)
> cheers, jamie
>
> --
> View this message in cont
w this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/usage-of-svn_wc_diff-tp30399137p30399137.html
Sent from the Subversion Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.