Well consider the svn cp subcommand, which does nothing more than delete/add.
One day svn cp could do more than that.
Likewise, svn undo could initially do nothing more than svn merge (and put a -
sign in front of the revision number), but perhaps one day do more.
Richard
- Original
merge, or would it do more?
Would the syntax for this new command differ significantly from
the existing merge command?
svn merge -c-42 .
Would you like to type this instead?
svn undo -c42 .
If the 'undo' command is just a thin wrapper around 'merge' you might as well
Hi everyone,
Is there any chance that svn could include an undo subcommand? Instead of
compelling us to do 'reverse merges'.
Richard
