Lorenz wrote on Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 14:29:34 +:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 19:44:07 -0400:
> >> If you switch the upstream repo for a software source repo, recompile.
> >> It's the best way to make sure you've not left some datestamped file
> >> i
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 19:44:07 -0400:
>> If you switch the upstream repo for a software source repo, recompile.
>> It's the best way to make sure you've not left some datestamped file
>> inconsistencies that could mess with the system.
>
>Subversion s
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 19:44:07 -0400:
> If you switch the upstream repo for a software source repo, recompile.
> It's the best way to make sure you've not left some datestamped file
> inconsistencies that could mess with the system.
Subversion supports both the "recompile
On 28.09.2016 01:44, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> If the file content with keywords expanded had been different before the
>> switch to after to the switch, then yes, I would have expected the mtime
>> to differ, too.
> And how, exactly, are you going to verify this? Put in a locally
> processed w
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Lorenz wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:01:31 +:
>> are you sure about tha being a bug?
>>
>> If for instance in the file the URL keyword is used to initialize a
>> string variable, wouldn't you want the file to be recompiled after the
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
> Sent: zaterdag 24 september 2016 09:11
> To: FEDERICO PRADES ILLANES
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn switch, touches files with svn:keywords
>
> FEDERICO PRADES ILLA
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>Lorenz wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:01:31 +:
>> are you sure about tha being a bug?
>>
>> If for instance in the file the URL keyword is used to initialize a
>> string variable, wouldn't you want the file to be recompiled after the
>> switch?
>
>You are describing a
Issue created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4656
*Federico Prades Illanes* - *ext. (2)75682 - Software Evangelist*
*Quantitative and Business Solutions (QBS) **- CIB - **BBVA*
On 26 September 2016 at 09:36, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Lorenz wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:01:31 +
Lorenz wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:01:31 +:
> are you sure about tha being a bug?
>
> If for instance in the file the URL keyword is used to initialize a
> string variable, wouldn't you want the file to be recompiled after the
> switch?
You are describing a different scenario than the OP
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>FEDERICO PRADES ILLANES wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:36:24 +0200:
>> Steps to reproduce:
>>
>>1. Create a branch b1.
>>2. Create an dummy file in b1, with svn:keywords.
>>3. Don't use the svn:keywords on the file.
>>4. Commit the changes to b1.
>>5. C
FEDERICO PRADES ILLANES wrote on Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:36:24 +0200:
> Steps to reproduce:
>
>1. Create a branch b1.
>2. Create an dummy file in b1, with svn:keywords.
>3. Don't use the svn:keywords on the file.
>4. Commit the changes to b1.
>5. Create a branch b2, from b1.
>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:36 AM, FEDERICO PRADES ILLANES
wrote:
> Hello subversion-users,
>
> I think I found a bug in subversion, not in the issue tracker:
>
> Subversion: svn, version 1.9.4 (r1740329)
>compiled Apr 24 2016, 15:40:35 on x86-microsoft-windows
> System: Windows 7, SP1
>
> Steps
Hello subversion-users,
I think I found a bug in subversion, not in the issue tracker:
Subversion: svn, version 1.9.4 (r1740329)
compiled Apr 24 2016, 15:40:35 on x86-microsoft-windows
System: Windows 7, SP1
Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a branch b1.
2. Create an dummy file in b1, with
13 matches
Mail list logo