Re: svn repo corruption question

2012-12-04 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Mojmír Svoboda, am Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2012 um 17:42 schrieben Sie: > old machine: 4476(Filip1) -> 4477(Filip2) -> 4478 (Vik1) -> 4478 (Vik2) > new machine: 4476(Filip1) -> 4477(Petra) [...] > I thought so... it's a bit an irony i end up exactly where i didn't > wanted to :) But I don

Re: svn repo corruption question

2012-12-04 Thread Mojmír Svoboda
Many thanks for an instant reply, Thorsten! > > But in the meanwhile, someone commited in both repositories > Doesn't this mean you ended up with revs 4477 to 4481 on the old repo > and loaded their content into the new repo as either new revisions, > increasing the revisions and changing content

Re: svn repo corruption question

2012-12-04 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Mojmír Svoboda, am Dienstag, 4. Dezember 2012 um 16:17 schrieben Sie: > But in the meanwhile, someone commited in both repositories. In the old > one because of running apache, in the new one because I thought I > So I dumped the 3 revisions from old machine and loaded them to > new one.

svn repo corruption question

2012-12-04 Thread Mojmír Svoboda
Hello, to begin with quote: - HOLLY: I've got to admit it, I've flamingoed-up. - RIMMER: What? - HOLLY: It's like a cock-up, only much, much bigger. This is my situation: I've tried to move repository from older machine (centos5) to new one without anyone noticing of course. So I created new vir