Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-11-05 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matthias Gerstner wrote on Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:11:47 +0100: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:35:23PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > That's correct but besides the point. The point was that 'svn log' in > > the trunk/ directory should show ^/A ^/B ^/C if you did the move/copy as > > I suggest

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-11-05 Thread Matthias Gerstner
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:35:23PM +0100, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > That's correct but besides the point. The point was that 'svn log' in > the trunk/ directory should show ^/A ^/B ^/C if you did the move/copy as > I suggested, but won't if you do it as 'mkdir trunk; cp A trunk; > cp B trunk; cp C

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matthias Gerstner wrote on Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 18:25:44 +0100: > > Did you accomplish that as three individual moves? Try accomplishing > > it as 'svn cp ^/ ^/trunk' instead. > > That didn't change anything. As I see it 'svn move' uses 'svn copy' > anyway to achieve its results. > That's corre

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-31 Thread Matthias Gerstner
> Did you accomplish that as three individual moves? Try accomplishing > it as 'svn cp ^/ ^/trunk' instead. That didn't change anything. As I see it 'svn move' uses 'svn copy' anyway to achieve its results. Maybe I chose a too simple example. Actually I have say 50 repositories each having their

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-31 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matthias Gerstner wrote on Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:27:17 +0100: > > "new" was created in r2 so running 'log' on it will not show earlier > > revisions. (Well, unless you pass -g) 'log' just walks the history of > > a node; it won't show revisions in which that node did not exist. > > > > But th

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-31 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 31, 2012, at 04:27, Matthias Gerstner wrote: > My use case is that I'm doing a big reorganization if small repositories > into a large repository. To do this I use 'svnadmin dump/load' and move > the resulting directories around in the new repository to achieve a new > structure. Another

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-31 Thread Matthias Gerstner
> "new" was created in r2 so running 'log' on it will not show earlier > revisions. (Well, unless you pass -g) 'log' just walks the history of > a node; it won't show revisions in which that node did not exist. > > But the reference to r1 is not lost; is it present in line 4 of the > output: T

Re: svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-30 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Matthias Gerstner wrote on Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 17:21:39 +0100: > echo -e "\n here no revision r1 is present\n" > svn log -v new "new" was created in r2 so running 'log' on it will not show earlier revisions. (Well, unless you pass -g) 'log' just walks the history of a node; it won't show revis

svn log output in directory-trees that contain moved sub-trees

2012-10-30 Thread Matthias Gerstner
Hello, I have some trouble wit the logic of the 'svn log' command. When reorganizing the directory structure in a repository by using 'svn move' I don't get the desired output from 'svn log' in all circumstances. I think this is best demonstrated by this sample script: -