--On 14 February 2011 10:04:41 + "Cooke, Mark"
wrote:
Can I suggest you read the manual at:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.basic.in-action.html
There is a section about mixed-revision repositories. In a nutshell,
'ci' only updates the files that have changed (having checke
hat directory
> does not mean
> > it is up to date. In fact, usually, after committing changes, your
> > working copy has mixed revisions and is therefore not up to
> date. Please
> > verify whether running "svn up" first fixes the problem.
>
> -Original
--On 14 February 2011 07:57:50 + Alex Bligh wrote:
If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made
to all files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've
pasted an example at:
http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk
where r12062 does not show up in "svn log .", but does
On Feb 14, 2011, at 01:57, Alex Bligh wrote:
> On 14 February 2011 01:10:08 -0600 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>>> If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to
>>> all files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've
>>> pasted an example at:
>>> http://pastebin.com/SF
--On 14 February 2011 01:10:08 -0600 Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to
all files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've
pasted an example at:
http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk
where r12062 does not show up in "svn log .", but d
On Feb 12, 2011, at 11:03, Alex Bligh wrote:
> If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to all
> files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've pasted an
> example at:
> http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk
> where r12062 does not show up in "svn log .", but does on th
If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to all
files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've pasted an
example at:
http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk
where r12062 does not show up in "svn log .", but does on the changed file.
svn diff . does the expected, and the
