Re: svn log: 1.7 and large limits

2012-07-31 Thread Dave Huang
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > The limit value is defined as an int (see opt_state defitinion in > subversion/svn/cl.h). According to the C standard an int is always > 32bit in size, and signed. FWIW, the C standard doesn't actually specify the absolute size of an int--it

Re: svn log: 1.7 and large limits

2012-07-31 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:44:18PM +0200, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > Hi all. > I've noticed that in SVN 1.7 limit behaviour has changed. Is that expected or > is that a bug? > > As I understand subversion supports revisions up to Long.MAX_VALUE = > 0x7fffL = > 9223372036854775807 > 100

Re: svn log: 1.7 and large limits

2012-07-31 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Dmitry Pavlenko writes: > >> Hi all. >> I've noticed that in SVN 1.7 limit behaviour has changed. Is that expected >> or is that a bug? > >> $ $svn16 log http://localhost:59714/repos -l 100 >> ---

Re: svn log: 1.7 and large limits

2012-07-31 Thread Philip Martin
Dmitry Pavlenko writes: > Hi all. > I've noticed that in SVN 1.7 limit behaviour has changed. Is that expected or > is that a bug? > $ $svn16 log http://localhost:59714/repos -l 100 > > r2 | (no author) | 2012-07-1

svn log: 1.7 and large limits

2012-07-31 Thread Dmitry Pavlenko
Hi all. I've noticed that in SVN 1.7 limit behaviour has changed. Is that expected or is that a bug? As I understand subversion supports revisions up to Long.MAX_VALUE = 0x7fffL = 9223372036854775807 > 1000 > 100 So both limits are possible thoeoretically. I ask