Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
sebb wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 18:05:39 +0100: > On 17 October 2011 16:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Do people who post here the error message with zero additional > > information expect support?  Or do they just do what the error message > > says without considering whether users@ is a tech su

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread sebb
On 17 October 2011 16:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Do people who post here the error message with zero additional > information expect support?  Or do they just do what the error message > says without considering whether users@ is a tech support forum or > a "Please send your crash reports here" ad

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Tony Sweeney
-Original Message- From: David Chapman [mailto:dcchap...@acm.org] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:36 To: Tony Sweeney Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed On 10/17/2011 8:24 AM, Tony Sweeney wrote: > > > -Original Message---

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread David Chapman
On 10/17/2011 8:24 AM, Tony Sweeney wrote: -Original Message- From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Do people who post here the error message with zero additional information expect support? Or do they just do what the error message says without considering whether users@ is a tech support forum or a "Please send your crash reports here" address? sebb wrote on Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 16:18:56 +010

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:24, Tony Sweeney wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] > Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav > Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] > Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav > Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed > > Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenk

RE: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Tony Sweeney
-Original Message- From: Ulrich Eckhardt [mailto:ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com] Sent: 17 October 2011 16:02 To: users@subversion.apache.org Cc: ponomarenko yaroslav Subject: Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenko yaroslav: > Got this error while try

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread sebb
On 17 October 2011 16:15, Les Mikesell wrote: > 2011/10/17 Ulrich Eckhardt : >> >>> svn: E235000: In file >>> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' >>> line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) >>> >>> win7 64 >>> Is there a way to

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Les Mikesell
2011/10/17 Ulrich Eckhardt : > >> svn: E235000: In file >> 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' >> line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) >> >> win7 64 >> Is there a way to recover? > > This has been reported ad nauseam. Please

Re: svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 17.10.2011 16:42, schrieb ponomarenko yaroslav: Got this error while trying svn cleanup svn: E235000: In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) win7 64 Is there a way to reco

svn 1.7 assertion failed

2011-10-17 Thread ponomarenko yaroslav
Got this error while trying svn cleanup svn: E235000: In file 'D:\Development\SVN\Releases\TortoiseSVN-1.7.0\ext\subversion\subversion\libsvn_wc\workqueue.c' line 672: assertion failed (checksum != NULL) win7 64 Is there a way to recover?