Hello,
Your repository layout is probably "linear" now.
According to the number of revisions, revision sizes and the underlying
operating system
it may be interesting to switch to "sharded" layout and tune the shard size
(default is 1000 revisions):
http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/index.php
Backup your repository *FIRST*.
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:11 AM, west alto wrote:
> Thanks guys, i'm new to upgrade using your way. which is safer using
> svnadmin dump/load or svnadmin upgrade/verify or svnadmin hotcopy
> given my situation where users can afford downtime.
>
> Please check if my
Thanks guys, i'm new to upgrade using your way. which is safer using
svnadmin dump/load or svnadmin upgrade/verify or svnadmin hotcopy
given my situation where users can afford downtime.
Please check if my process is correct:
- remove svn 1.3 and all its dependencies.
- install svn 1.6
- backup m
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Sat, 3 Jul 2010 at 20:26 -:
> > what difference and advantage bet. linear and sharded?
>
> It's explained here, a bit:
>
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.reposadmin.maint.tk.fsfsreshard
>
> (You don't need the fsfs-reshard script mentio
On Jul 3, 2010, at 11:03, west alto wrote:
> running svnadmin hotcopy does not touch the source repository?
Correct.
> what difference and advantage bet. linear and sharded?
It's explained here, a bit:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.reposadmin.maint.html#svn.reposadmin.maint.tk.fsfsr
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 12:03 PM, west alto wrote:
> running svnadmin hotcopy does not touch the source repository? what
> difference and advantage bet. linear and sharded?
>
>
> Thanks,
It builds the new repo, does a dump and reload (in the same format,
which I hadn'e realized), then copies over
running svnadmin hotcopy does not touch the source repository? what
difference and advantage bet. linear and sharded?
Thanks,
West
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 23:11 -0400:
>> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM, west alto wrote:
>> > Thanks guys, Ho do i upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6? Do i need to install
>> > first 1.4 then do a svn dump and load, then 1.5 and t
Sorry, page link has changed:
http://ymartin59.free.fr/wordpress/index.php/projets/tune-subversion-fsfs-repository/
Comments and feedback are welcome
- "Yves Martin" a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> For an upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6, I have simply apply "svnadmin upgrade"
> command
> and check integri
Hello,
For an upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6, I have simply apply "svnadmin upgrade" command
and check integrity with "svnadmin verify".
Then, the repository is still in "linear" mode - which is not an issue, it
works.
But for performance reason, it is better to move to "sharded" mode.
To do so, I h
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 17:18 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 08:06 -0400:
> >> Second: throw HTTPS based access the heck out.
> >
> > Isn't this irrelevant to the OP's question?
>
> Nope. He's u
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 23:11 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM, west alto wrote:
> > Thanks guys, Ho do i upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6? Do i need to install
> > first 1.4 then do a svn dump and load, then 1.5 and then svn dump and
> > load etc.
>
> No, move aside the
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 10:04 PM, west alto wrote:
> Thanks guys, Ho do i upgrade from 1.3 to 1.6? Do i need to install
> first 1.4 then do a svn dump and load, then 1.5 and then svn dump and
> load etc.
No, move aside the repository, do a good backup to tape, then install
version 1.6. Then d
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 08:06 -0400:
>> First, upgrade from version 1.3.
>
> +1
>
>> Second: throw HTTPS based access the heck out.
>
> Isn't this irrelevant to the OP's question?
Nope. He's using mod_dav_svn and LDAP au
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 at 08:06 -0400:
> First, upgrade from version 1.3.
+1
> Second: throw HTTPS based access the heck out.
Isn't this irrelevant to the OP's question?
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 08:06, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> Second: throw HTTPS based access the heck out. It has always presented
> a security issue because the UNIX and Linux Subversion client stores
> passwords in clear text, no matter which protocol you use.
Unless you use gnome-keyring or kde
First, upgrade from version 1.3. I recognize that "professional grade"
Linux distributions consider software stability critical, but
Subversion is still significantly evolving, and the number of
important upgrades since version 1.3 is quite large. In particular,
working copies that are checked out
Hi Gurus,
Kindly help me with my problem.
Subversion is running fine for sometime and then system load suddenly
goes high and no one can login to the server.
172.23.14.1 - - [01/Jul/2010:10:18:36 +0800] "PROPFIND
/xyz/branches/prod HTTP/1.1" 401 1263
172.23.14.1 - - [01/Jul/2010:10:18:36 +0800]
18 matches
Mail list logo
