On 12/10/13 5:28 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> The correct English term is "reclaim". We should review our release notes more
> diligently. :)
Agreed. Fixed in r1549892.
On 10.12.2013 14:15, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2013-12-10 12:12:06 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> First, "svn help cleanup" currently says:
>>>
>>> cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming
>>> u
On 2013-12-10 12:12:06 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > First, "svn help cleanup" currently says:
> >
> > cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming
> > unfinished operations, etc.
> >
> > I suggest
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:28:52AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> First, "svn help cleanup" currently says:
>
> cleanup: Recursively clean up the working copy, removing locks, resuming
> unfinished operations, etc.
>
> I suggest to change it to something like:
>
> cleanup: Recursively clean up
On 2013-12-10 01:00:32 +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
> >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> >> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn clea
On 2013-12-09 17:37:28 +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
> > the problem, but
> > 1. this is
On 2013-12-09 19:55:54 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
> > I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> > over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
> > the problem, but
> > 1. this isn't d
On 10 December 2013 01:32, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:00:32 +0400:
>> On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
>> >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get hug
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:00:32 +0400:
> On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
> >> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> >> over time (several times the expected size). A
On 9 December 2013 21:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
>> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
>> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
>> the problem, but
>> 1. this isn't document
Vincent Lefevre wrote on Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 17:30:21 +0100:
> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
> the problem, but
> 1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that);
It's doc
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:30:21PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
> over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
> the problem, but
> 1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that);
> 2. t
I noticed that the size of the .svn/pristine directory can get huge
over time (several times the expected size). A "svn cleanup" solves
the problem, but
1. this isn't documented (I'm wondering how many users know that);
2. this isn't automatic.
About (2), svn could warn the user when a cleanup cou
13 matches
Mail list logo
