On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
> A "permanent branch" with no merging sounds more like a fork than a
> branch.
It's pretty common, really. You're about to do a release, so you make
a release branch. In many sites, they don't bother mer
On 11/3/2010 11:56 AM, Andy Levy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version -
the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are get
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 09:44, KM wrote:
>
> We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
> version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version
> - the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are getting ready to
> deliver some file c
k ahead in case.
--- On Wed, 11/3/10, David Weintraub wrote:
From: David Weintraub
Subject: Re: simple question on branching
To: "KM"
Cc: "svn-apache-users-list"
Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 10:36 AM
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM, KM wrote:
>
> We don&
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:44 AM, KM wrote:
>
> We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple
> nature of our version releases with very little overlap.
>
> Any reason that creating a permanent branch on the tree would matter
> -- i mean never merging it anywhere? I don't see wh
We don't often use branching and/or merging based on the simple nature of our
version releases with very little overlap. We have a longer ranging version -
the next 7 months or so in progress. Since we are getting ready to deliver
some file changes I'd like to use the trunk instead of a branc
