Andre Harper wrote on Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:56:02 -0400:
> If I understand the skip-delta cost, which I may not completely, it sounds
> like each tagged release based on the trunk will occupy more space as it is
> farther away from the trunk revision number?
Yes, unless directory deltification i
Thanks for everyone’s replies.
Took me a couple days to review the links everyone sent.
Thorsten’s links sent me to several of your posts, Mark -- thanks. Based
on your feedback it appears the new release of svn within a month or so
should resolve the problem. It appears the best solution is to
On 2013-06-04 16:30, Andre Harper wrote:
> Hi, all –
>
> I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any
> responses.
>
> I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year.
> As a part of our process, we tag each successful run of our systems.
> This can
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Andre Harper wrote:
> Hi, all –
>
> I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any
> responses.
>
> I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year.
> As a part of our process, we tag each successful run of our systems.
>
Guten Tag Andre Harper,
am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013 um 16:30 schrieben Sie:
> We’re having an issue with the db/revs directory size, which for all
> our projects currently exceeds 289G. We only use relatively small
> working directories containing less than a meg of text files; no
> binary files.
Hi, all –
I am not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any
responses.
I am on a team that began using subversion near the end of last year.
As a part of our process, we tag each successful run of our systems.
This can mean thousands of tags for certain systems every six mont
