On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 08:36:42AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> >> It would have been nice if --incremental would automatically upgrade the
> >> target repository (and fallback to a full backup) if the versions
> >> mismatch.
> >
> > Hmm.
Hi,
Von: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> >> It would have been nice if --incremental would automatically upgrade
> >> the target repository (and fallback to a full backup) if the versions
> >> mismatch.
> >
> > Hmm. Int
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> It would have been nice if --incremental would automatically upgrade the
>> target repository (and fallback to a full backup) if the versions
>> mismatch.
>
> Hmm. Interesting idea, but replacing failure modes with automagical
> behaviour
On 8/10/2013 6:28 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:25:24 +0300:
Thomas Harold wrote on Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:53:43 -0400:
With the 'svnadmin hotcopy --incremental' backups, we have to do extra
checking in the script (comparing reponame/db/format versions
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:25:24 +0300:
> Thomas Harold wrote on Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:53:43 -0400:
> > With the 'svnadmin hotcopy --incremental' backups, we have to do extra
> > checking in the script (comparing reponame/db/format versions) in order
> > to make sure that
Thomas Harold wrote on Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:53:43 -0400:
> With the 'svnadmin hotcopy --incremental' backups, we have to do extra
> checking in the script (comparing reponame/db/format versions) in order
> to make sure that the hotcopy runs correctly.
>
If you have to do that, please do it
