I think it's intentional.
If we change the first command to have the semantics of the second
command, wouldn't it mean that the second command is equivalent to
'svn revert -R ./'?
If yes, we can't change it --- rather bad compatibility surprised for
everyone who's used to 'svn revert --cl foo -R
Hi,
I have found an odd behaviour with the revert command. Maybe it's intended, but
I don't find it very intuitive. I'm using SVN 1.6.9.
If I have a changelist and I want to revert all changes made in all files in
the changelist I would use the following
svn revert --changelist
That doesn't
