On 10.03.2014 13:19, Bert Huijben wrote:
I think I would call this expected behavior... and I will try to explain
why.
You are forgetting one very important detail in getting to this state: You
got a tree conflict.
The 'svn up' on an excluded directory is what you would do to reintroduce
the ex
> -Original Message-
> From: Holger Schmidt [mailto:holger.schm...@zmdi.com]
> Sent: maandag 10 maart 2014 09:19
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: Holger Schmidt
> Subject: Re: Update in excluded directory schedules files for deletion
>
> On 03.03.2014 16:
On 03.03.2014 16:26, Holger Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
Can someone please look at this issue, I think it is a bug. I have a
working copy with some directories, some have private files in them. I
don't need one of the directories and exclude it from the working copy
with "svn up --set-depth=exclude". The
Hi,
Can someone please look at this issue, I think it is a bug. I have a
working copy with some directories, some have private files in them. I
don't need one of the directories and exclude it from the working copy
with "svn up --set-depth=exclude". The directory remains because there
were
