On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 05:45:53PM -0400, Brian Pitts wrote:
> It is a little hard to wrap my head around the idea that although I
> committed the change deleting foo/bar, I now have to update foo/ for
> my working copy to truly reflect that foo/bar is deleted. To
> paraphrase Johan from #3256, 'wh
On 06/02/2010 04:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Look at the output of
svn info foo
at this point. You'll see that foo is not at the HEAD revision,
i.e. something older than 1740.
foo/bar was bumped to the HEAD revision because it was a commit target.
But foo was not a commit target so it is le
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:04:38PM -0400, Brian Pitts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm experiencing a tree conflict in a situation where there should be no
> conflict. Basically, after removing the contents of a directory I'm
> unable to commit deleting the directory even though no one has modified
> it. The
Hi,
I'm experiencing a tree conflict in a situation where there should be no
conflict. Basically, after removing the contents of a directory I'm
unable to commit deleting the directory even though no one has modified
it. The client is 1.6.6. I've tried with server versions 1.4.3 and
1.6.9. Below i
