Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 12, 2010, at 15:47, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/12/2010 3:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> What should happen to things that are added to a working copy some other >>> way but aren't managed by subversion? I don't think you want them

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 3/12/2010 3:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file externals, but fo

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> > >> Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed >> considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file >> externals, but for this behavior of dir externals

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Hi David, when I analysed externals in 1.6 about a year ago, that is what I found. I consider it a bug. Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file exter

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
gmail.com] > Sent: 12 March 2010 14:08 > To: David Aldrich > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy > > On 12 March 2010 11:28, David Aldrich wrote: >> Hi >> >> I haven't had a reply to this question of

RE: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread David Aldrich
ck out is required. Or is it ok to delete the > 'external' folder/file in my wc using an operating system delete operation? > > Best regards > > David > > > From: David Aldrich [david.aldr...@eu.nec.com] > Sent: 11 March

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread neels
ete the > 'external' folder/file in my wc using an operating system delete operation? > > Best regards > > David > > > From: David Aldrich [david.aldr...@eu.nec.com] > Sent: 11 March 2010 16:11 > To: users@subvers

RE: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread David Aldrich
__ From: David Aldrich [david.aldr...@eu.nec.com] Sent: 11 March 2010 16:11 To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy Hi I have a question about externals. I tried the following scenario in my working copy: 1) Add an external definition to director

Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-11 Thread David Aldrich
Hi I have a question about externals. I tried the following scenario in my working copy: 1) Add an external definition to directory A, specifying subdirectory B 2) Commit directory A 3) Update directory A I then see A/B populated Then: 4) Edit external definition to directory A, specifying su