Too many levels of symbolic links
This error is generated by the Operating system. Inspect
'/#/svn/#//##/main/default/objects/#/validationRules'
This file/link is either directly or inderictly pointing to it self, so
subversion can not use it. When you ad
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:04 AM Morin, Michael wrote:
> svn: E40: Can't read directory
> '/#/svn/#//##/main/default/objects/#/validationRules':
> Too many levels of symbolic links
>
> Whenever I run this manually, whether I call the shell
nother location
(downloading from Bitbucket).
3) svn add --force .
4) svn status, which looks for something that was deleted from git and deletes
it for svn
5) svn commit.
The svn add command seems to fail whenever it runs via CA Workload by running
into "too many levels of symbolic links" er
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:59 +00:00:
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2020, at 13:13, M.Eng. René Schwarz wrote:
>
> > I am using mod_dav_svn with Apache2 in combination with a SVN repository
> > containing symbolic links. When a URL pointing to a symbolic link is
>
On Dec 16, 2020, at 13:13, M.Eng. René Schwarz wrote:
> I am using mod_dav_svn with Apache2 in combination with a SVN repository
> containing symbolic links. When a URL pointing to a symbolic link is
> accessed, the web server does not follow this link, but provides a text file
&
Hello,
I am using mod_dav_svn with Apache2 in combination with a SVN repository
containing symbolic links. When a URL pointing to a symbolic link is
accessed, the web server does not follow this link, but provides a text
file with the content "link [path to file or directory]"
Thank you very much Stefan!
Will try out the patch.
Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com
This message contains confidential information and is intended only
for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please
notif
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 01:54:22PM +0100, christian.asmus...@ubs.com wrote:
> Dear *,
>
> I was happy to see subversion 1.7.3 was release and that many bugs were
> fixed.
>
> This bug did not get fixed though
> (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4052) and that
> would have made
Dear *,
I was happy to see subversion 1.7.3 was release and that many bugs were
fixed.
This bug did not get fixed though
(http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4052) and that
would have made me even happier J
Has anyone had time to look into this?
Regards
Christian
V
symbolic
links
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:13:56PM +0100, christian.asmus...@ubs.com
wrote:
> Dear "Users",
>
>
>
> It seems that on svn 1.7.1 deleted symbolic links on a branch cause a
> tree conflict when a -reintegrate merge is done back to trunk.
>
> T
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:13:56PM +0100, christian.asmus...@ubs.com wrote:
> Dear "Users",
>
>
>
> It seems that on svn 1.7.1 deleted symbolic links on a branch cause a
> tree conflict when a -reintegrate merge is done back to trunk.
>
> The same merge don
Dear "Users",
It seems that on svn 1.7.1 deleted symbolic links on a branch cause a
tree conflict when a -reintegrate merge is done back to trunk.
The same merge done with svn 1.6.17 smoothly passes as a normal
deletion.
See below a simple "script"
Do you use option 'nbrl' when mounting?
Like this (in stab):
//winserver/repo /opt/csvn/data/repositories cifs \
nobrl,user=csvn,password=***,rw,uid=csvn,gid=csvn, \
dir_mode=0755,file_mode=0755 0 0
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:17:18AM -0400, Desjardin, Donald wrote:
> In the following example we have sym-links called CURRENT_BLAH_BLAH that
> point to the correct firmware file. During the checkout, if the
> destination has been created before the link, it works, if the link
> happens to get cre
I am seeing a consistent problem with subversion checkouts into a CIFS
mount, and the creation of sym-links.
I wanted to see if anyone else has see this before I report it.
I can create sym-links on the CIFS mount manually, both to an existing
destination and to a destination that doesn't exist
On Mar 15, 2010, at 06:59, David Weintraub wrote:
> Symbolic links are not supported directly by Subversion.
Of course they are, on operating systems other than Windows.
Symbolic links are not supported directly by Subversion. The NTFS file
system does allow for symbolic links, but until Windows Vista, there
was no command that could produce symbolic links.
The "mklink" command works in Windows 7 and Windows Vista. You need
System admin rights in or
On Mar 15, 2010, at 02:04, Han,Xing wrote:
> Symbolic link is supported in windows now?
Not as far as I know.
hi,
Symbolic link is supported in windows now?
if can, please tell how to do that.
thank you very much!
yours
Starhan
19 matches
Mail list logo
