On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 04:55:24PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> On Monday 08 February 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > 2. Target being a non-working copy.
> > > I don't remember where I wanted to use this one, I believe I wanted to
> > > apply changes I made to an SVN vendor branch to a (non-v
On Monday 08 February 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
[...]
> There has also been talk among developers to implement "true" offline
> commits in wc-ng (stored directly within the working copy meta data).
> So it may be that implementing patch queues won't be necessary. We'll see.
Cool, thanks for all
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:22:56PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> On Friday 05 February 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> [ Overview of SVN 1.7's 'patch' command ]
>
> Stefan, thank you for that overview!
>
> I have a question that touches that topic and which I stumbled over sometime
> in the pas
On Friday 05 February 2010, Stefan Sperling wrote:
[ Overview of SVN 1.7's 'patch' command ]
Stefan, thank you for that overview!
I have a question that touches that topic and which I stumbled over sometime
in the past about possible sources and targets of merge operations:
1. Source being a wo
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 10:08:02AM -0700, Alan Leung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in a svn patch command and noticed that something
> related was committed to trunk based on the discussion in
>
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=511
>
> I built the version 1.7.0-dev from t
Hi,
I am interested in a svn patch command and noticed that something
related was committed to trunk based on the discussion in
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=511
I built the version 1.7.0-dev from trunk this past week and did some
testing. However, from what I can dete
