On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 4 August 2011 01:59, David Weintraub wrote:
> Thanks guys. I'm just stupid. I've been going on and on about what we
> want to do, but I haven't even stated the obvious:
>
> * It's just about removing stale files from being tracked by
> Subve
On 4 August 2011 01:59, David Weintraub wrote:
> ...
> SNIP
> ...
> I have what I call my Kitchen Sink pre-commit trigger that does all
> sorts of stuff. One of the tasks it can do is "ban" files based upon
> their name (either regular expression or Ant glob). If a user adds a
> file with a forbid
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> OK, looks like I have to explain a bit further to clear this up and
> hopefully get some solutions.
>
> We use the repository to directly serve some files (so Subversion
> updates are immediately reflected). Something like
> http://subversion.apa
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 05:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> That's what "svn checkout" for initial setup, and "svn update" or "svn
>> revert" of the local copy are for.
>
> We already have that working, I just outlined the current setup:
>
> http://file
On 3 August 2011 05:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> That's what "svn checkout" for initial setup, and "svn update" or "svn
> revert" of the local copy are for.
We already have that working, I just outlined the current setup:
http://files.foobar.org/ is a direct file mirror (less revision
control;
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 3 August 2011 04:37, David Weintraub wrote:
>> NO! NO! NO! AUUUGGGHHH!
>>
>> Never update a repository with a hook.! That's why you're given the
>> relatively safe "svnlook" command. It allows you to look, but not
>> touch a repository.
>> ..
On 3 August 2011 04:37, David Weintraub wrote:
> NO! NO! NO! AUUUGGGHHH!
>
> Never update a repository with a hook.! That's why you're given the
> relatively safe "svnlook" command. It allows you to look, but not
> touch a repository.
> ...
> SNIP
> ...
Arrrgghhh damn it! Exactly what I feared. E
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> We have a _local_ checkout of the repository on our server, and our
> post-commit hook needs to run svn-add, svn-rm and svn-ci commands in
> that checkout. All of these commands run fine. For eg. (within the
> post-commit script):
NO! NO! NO! AU
Hi list
I've been stumped by this issue for months. I had never enough time to
troubleshoot it, so I'm finally desperate after having spent an entire
day trying to figure things out.
We have a _local_ checkout of the repository on our server, and our
post-commit hook needs to run svn-add, svn-rm
