Greetings, Justin Connell!
> The reason, I'm asking such strange questions is that I have a very
> abnormal situation on my hands here. I previously took a full dump of
> the repo (for the reason you implied) where the original size of the
> repo on disk was 150 GB, and the resulting dump file e
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 18:39, Justin Connell
wrote:
> The reason, I'm asking such strange questions is that I have a very abnormal
> situation on my hands here. I previously took a full dump of the repo (for
> the reason you implied) where the original size of the repo on disk was 150
> GB, and
Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Justin Connell!
I have a really huge repo that occupies 151 GB of space on the file system.
Just to give some background, there is a lot of content that gets added and
deleted from the repo, now we are sitting with a rev number of over 1, 500 000.
My question
Greetings, Justin Connell!
>> I have a really huge repo that occupies 151 GB of space on the file system.
>> Just to give some background, there is a lot of content that gets added and
>> deleted from the repo, now we are sitting with a rev number of over 1, 500
>> 000.
>>
>> My question is, wou
On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:16, Justin Connell wrote:
> I have a really huge repo that occupies 151 GB of space on the file system.
> Just to give some background, there is a lot of content that gets added and
> deleted from the repo, now we are sitting with a rev number of over 1, 500
> 000.
>
>
I have a really huge repo that occupies 151 GB of space on the file
system. Just to give some background, there is a lot of content that
gets added and deleted from the repo, now we are sitting with a rev
number of over 1, 500 000.
My question is, would it be possible to take a dump of just a
