On Jul 30, 2010, at 6:41 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
>> 2. Copied revision revs/7/7263 file from that dumpfile-backup-based repo
>> into my production repo (the one missing some revs/ files -- I'll call it my
>> corrupt repo).
>
> Co
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 17:22:43 -0400:
> On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 20:05:16 +0200:
> >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, it appears I cannot create dump f
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> 2. Copied revision revs/7/7263 file from that dumpfile-backup-based repo into
> my production repo (the one missing some revs/ files -- I'll call it my
> corrupt repo).
Copying rev files like this most likely won't work.
> 3. Tried
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 20:05:16 +0200:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, it appears I cannot create dump files from revisions
>>> after a missing revs/ file gap. All the dump
On Jul 30, 2010, at 2:05 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it appears I cannot create dump files from revisions
>> after a missing revs/ file gap. All the dumpfiles I created which
>> began with a revision past a point of c
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 20:05:16 +0200:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it appears I cannot create dump files from revisions
> > after a missing revs/ file gap. All the dumpfiles I created which
> > began with a revision past a
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:57:12PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> Unfortunately, it appears I cannot create dump files from revisions
> after a missing revs/ file gap. All the dumpfiles I created which
> began with a revision past a point of continuity were unusable. They
> collapsed upon re-import (s
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
>> Dear SVNers,
>>
>> I'm trying to recover an SVN repository after a hard drive failure.
>> From 7,797 revisions, we lost the following seven (7) files from the
>> .../repo_dir/db/
Eiren Smith wrote on Wed, 16 Jun 2010 at 00:25 -:
>
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > On Jun 15, 2010, at 15:37, Eiren Smith wrote:
> >
> > > I considered doing it the way you described. Unfortunately, most of the
> > > seven (7) missing revisions are for binary files
Eiren Smith wrote on Sat, 19 Jun 2010 at 18:47 -:
> On Jun 19, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 23:50 -:
> > > I might also do some fake revisions (to some unrelated dummy
> > > files, I suppose) to keep my revision numbers from shifting.
>
On Jun 19, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 23:50 -:
On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 10:01 -0400:
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Eiren Smith wrote on Thu, 17 Jun 2
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 23:50 -:
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 10:01 -0400:
> > > On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > Eiren Smith wrote on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 at 23:24 -:
> > > > > Any ide
On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
CC += users@
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 10:01 -0400:
On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Eiren Smith wrote on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 at 23:24 -:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Eiren Smith wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at
CC += users@
Eiren Smith wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 10:01 -0400:
> On Jun 18, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Eiren Smith wrote on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 at 23:24 -:
> > > On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Eiren Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wr
Eiren Smith wrote on Thu, 17 Jun 2010 at 23:24 -:
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Eiren Smith wrote:
>
> > On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> > > > Sir:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply. I'll read
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:20 PM, Eiren Smith wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
Sir:
Thanks for your reply. I'll read those references you cited.
P.S. Other files may also be missing from the revprops/ dir,
On Jun 15, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 15:37, Eiren Smith wrote:
I considered doing it the way you described. Unfortunately, most of
the seven (7) missing revisions are for binary files (DLLs and
DOCs) and so I can't reproduce their variations by hand. And sin
On Jun 15, 2010, at 15:37, Eiren Smith wrote:
> I considered doing it the way you described. Unfortunately, most of the seven
> (7) missing revisions are for binary files (DLLs and DOCs) and so I can't
> reproduce their variations by hand. And since SVN is storing binary deltas,
> not entire fi
On Jun 15, 2010, at 4:25 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:59:10PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
Can you still create dumpfiles containing the revisions that
did not get lost? If so, you could stitch together a new repos
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:59:10PM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> >...
> >Can you still create dumpfiles containing the revisions that
> >did not get lost? If so, you could stitch together a new repository
> >and fill in the missing revisions m
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
...
Can you still create dumpfiles containing the revisions that
did not get lost? If so, you could stitch together a new repository
and fill in the missing revisions manually (if you still know what
happened in those revisions, or can guess w
On Jun 15, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:36, Eiren Smith wrote:
Working copies do not contain logs; "svn log" always connects to
the repository.
Actually, for what it's worth in the current context, SVN has
supported local log cacheing for a while. I don't
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:36, Eiren Smith wrote:
>> Working copies do not contain logs; "svn log" always connects to the
>> repository.
>
> Actually, for what it's worth in the current context, SVN has supported local
> log cacheing for a while. I don't recall which version introduced this
> fea
> -Original Message-
> From: Eiren Smith [mailto:eir...@gmail.com]
> Actually, for what it's worth in the current context, SVN has
> supported local log cacheing for a while. I don't recall which version
> introduced this feature, maybe 1.5 or 1.6.
>
> /eiren
We are currently at a version t
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
> Working copies do not contain logs; "svn log" always connects to the
> repository.
Oh crap. Here I am thinking all this time that the working copy catually had a
copy of the log to work from. Ya, I know
> Michael,
>
> Thanks for jumping in.
>
> > If someone does have the area in question checked out, you'd have a
> > copy of the log in which to use to repair the repository.
>
> The revisions are not recent. Would the log of someone's working copy
> include binary deltas needed to recreate the actu
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:33 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:26, Brown, Michael wrote:
I'm sorta jumping in the middle of this, but doesn't anyone have a
working copy of the repository checked out, especially the area in
question? Obviously no one should have the whole trunk ch
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:26, Brown, Michael wrote:
> I'm sorta jumping in the middle of this, but doesn't anyone have a working
> copy of the repository checked out, especially the area in question?
> Obviously no one should have the whole trunk checked out, as people work with
> pieces of a rep
k: 608-288-6969
cell: 608-206-6843
-Original Message-
From: Eiren Smith [mailto:eir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Subversion Users List
Subject: Re: Recovering repository with multiple missing rev/ files
I won't be able to accurately mimic the seven missin
sage-
> From: Eiren Smith [mailto:eir...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:20 AM
> To: Subversion Users List
> Subject: Re: Recovering repository with multiple missing rev/ files
>
> I won't be able to accurately mimic the seven missing changes as most
> of them
On Jun 15, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
Sir:
Thanks for your reply. I'll read those references you cited.
P.S. Other files may also be missing from the revprops/ dir, not
just 7437 -- If I'm willing to lose commit mes
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:49:44AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> Sir:
>
> Thanks for your reply. I'll read those references you cited.
>
> >>
> >>P.S. Other files may also be missing from the revprops/ dir, not
> >>just 7437 -- If I'm willing to lose commit messages, can I live
> >>without some rev
On Jun 15, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
Dear SVNers,
I'm trying to recover an SVN repository after a hard drive failure.
From 7,797 revisions, we lost the following seven (7) files from the
.../repo_dir/db/revs/7/ direct
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:09:39AM -0400, Eiren Smith wrote:
> Dear SVNers,
>
> I'm trying to recover an SVN repository after a hard drive failure.
> From 7,797 revisions, we lost the following seven (7) files from the
> .../repo_dir/db/revs/7/ directory:
>
> 7437 (7-9 Dec 2009) (file also miss
Dear SVNers,
I'm trying to recover an SVN repository after a hard drive failure.
From 7,797 revisions, we lost the following seven (7) files from
the .../repo_dir/db/revs/7/ directory:
7437 (7-9 Dec 2009) (file also missing from revprops/ dir)
7461 (16 Dec 2009)
7519 (8 Jan 2010)
35 matches
Mail list logo
