On Apr 26, 2011, at 19:33, Hashir Baqai wrote:
> Johan,
>
> I've seen this referenced wherever the issue arises. Pasting what I assume is
> the portion that is of interest:
>
> Is Subversion a Day Early?
>
> If you specify a single date as a revision without specifying a time of day
> (for e
Johan,
I've seen this referenced wherever the issue arises. Pasting what I assume
is the portion that is of interest:
*Is Subversion a Day Early?
If you specify a single date as a revision without specifying a time of day
(for example 2006-11-27), you may think that Subversion should give you th
Johan,
I've seen this referenced wherever the issue arises. Pasting what I assume
is the portion that is of interest:
Is Subversion a Day Early?
If you specify a single date as a revision without specifying a time of day
(for example 2006-11-27), you may think that Subversion should give you
Yes, what you describe is indeed how it works. It's not a bug. See:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.tour.revs.specifiers.html#svn.tour.revs.dates
for some more information (more specifically in the section "Is
Subversion a Day Early?")
Cheers,
Johan
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:05
I just ran into (at least one variation of) this phenomena and believe I know
what's going on.
When a date range is used, the first thing that svn does is decide which
revision to start the log from. It does this by taking a snapshot of the
HEAD revision AT THE START TIME specified. Not the first
