Den tors 11 nov. 2021 kl 16:21 skrev Nathan Hartman :
>
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:42 PM Daniel Sahlberg
> wrote:
> > There has been some discussion but I don't think there was an actual
> > decision taken. So I'm throwing in a suggestion to add the following
> > text to packages.html (just below
On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:42 PM Daniel Sahlberg
wrote:
> There has been some discussion but I don't think there was an actual
> decision taken. So I'm throwing in a suggestion to add the following
> text to packages.html (just below the regarding "larger collections of
> software", and before the C
On Nov 8, 2021, at 12:21, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
>
> Den mån 8 nov. 2021 kl 16:57 skrev Ryan Schmidt:
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2021, at 07:18, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
>>>
> WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version
> of Mac OS supported by Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts?
>
Den tors 21 okt. 2021 kl 18:03 skrev Nathan Hartman :
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:55 AM Daniel Sahlberg
> wrote:
> >> Would it make sense to give them a heads up before removing the links in
> >> case they would like to release newer packages and remain on the list?
> >
> >
> > Yes, if we have
Den mån 8 nov. 2021 kl 16:57 skrev Ryan Schmidt
:
>
> On Oct 16, 2021, at 07:18, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> > Den ons 6 okt. 2021 kl 00:46 skrev Ryan Schmidt:
> >> On Oct 4, 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version
> >
On Oct 16, 2021, at 07:18, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> Den ons 6 okt. 2021 kl 00:46 skrev Ryan Schmidt:
>> On Oct 4, 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
>>
>>> WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version of
>>> Mac OS supported by Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts?
>>
>> I am a
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 2:55 AM Daniel Sahlberg
wrote:
>> Would it make sense to give them a heads up before removing the links in
>> case they would like to release newer packages and remain on the list?
>
>
> Yes, if we have any contact channels (I'm not sure about sending to an
> anonymous in
Den mån 18 okt. 2021 kl 03:57 skrev Nathan Hartman :
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:38 PM Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 11:01 AM Nathan Hartman
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:25 AM Mark Phippard
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > In terms of the policy, I think it should b
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 12:38 PM Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 11:01 AM Nathan Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:25 AM Mark Phippard
> wrote:
> > >
> > > In terms of the policy, I think it should be that our latest LTS
> > > release must be available. If they h
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 11:01 AM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:25 AM Mark Phippard wrote:
> >
> > In terms of the policy, I think it should be that our latest LTS
> > release must be available. If they have other packages available that
> > is fine but the latest LTS must be
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 11:01 AM Nathan Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:25 AM Mark Phippard wrote:
> >
> > In terms of the policy, I think it should be that our latest LTS
> > release must be available. If they have other packages available that
> > is fine but the latest LTS must be
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 9:25 AM Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> In terms of the policy, I think it should be that our latest LTS
> release must be available. If they have other packages available that
> is fine but the latest LTS must be one of them. In terms of the types
> of exceptions I could envision
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:57 AM Daniel Sahlberg
wrote:
> I second Mark's suggestion that we should only list those providing recent
> versions. Would this be a reasonable definition: "Any software listed should
> provide the latest bugfix of any supported version", where "version" is 1.10,
> 1
Den mån 4 okt. 2021 kl 18:26 skrev Mark Phippard :
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Nathan Hartman
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark Phippard
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If "only providing outdated versions" is
Den mån 4 okt. 2021 kl 17:44 skrev Mark Phippard :
> Historically, we only allowed distributions of our command line
> binaries to be listed. TortoiseSVN was the first exception we made and
> that was after they added the command line binaries as part of their
> installer. But AFAIK, clients like
Den ons 6 okt. 2021 kl 00:46 skrev Ryan Schmidt <
subversion-2...@ryandesign.com>:
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
>
> > WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version
> of Mac OS supported by Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts?
>
> I am a manager of MacPorts. MacP
On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 17:45:39 -0500, Ryan Schmidt said:
>I am a manager of MacPorts. MacPorts supports Mac OS X 10.4 and later
>and provides binaries for Mac OS X 10.6 and later. See:
>
>https://ports.macports.org/port/subversion
Ryan,
Thanks! That worked for me. It was able to install svn 1.14.
On Oct 4, 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote:
> WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version of
> Mac OS supported by Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts?
I am a manager of MacPorts. MacPorts supports Mac OS X 10.4 and later and
provides binaries for Mac OS X 10.6 and later. S
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 1:00 PM Sean McBride wrote:
>
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:07:04 -0400, Mark Phippard said:
>
> >I personally use Homebrew. The SVN package is all precompiled so it is
> >easy to install. Myself and other SVN devs have even improved the
> >formula over the years.
>
> Mark,
>
> No
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:07:04 -0400, Mark Phippard said:
>I personally use Homebrew. The SVN package is all precompiled so it is
>easy to install. Myself and other SVN devs have even improved the
>formula over the years.
Mark,
Not sure if this is veering off-topic for this list, but I've tried usi
On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Nathan Hartman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If "only providing outdated versions" is a reason for de-listing then sadly
>>> both CollabNet and WANdisco s
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg
> wrote:
>
> > If "only providing outdated versions" is a reason for de-listing then sadly
> > both CollabNet and WANdisco should go (at least when 1.10 is EOL). I can
> > edit the website b
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg
wrote:
> If "only providing outdated versions" is a reason for de-listing then sadly
> both CollabNet and WANdisco should go (at least when 1.10 is EOL). I can edit
> the website but I'd appreciate if anyone else in PMC would give their opinion
>
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 17:23:56 +0200, Daniel Sahlberg said:
>I don't pretend to know anything about Macos, but WANdisco is providing
>Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version of Mac OS supported by
>Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts? If not, then I think it is reasonable to keep the
>link - at least u
Den mån 4 okt. 2021 kl 15:57 skrev Mark Phippard :
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 7:17 PM Sean McBride
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:07:04 -0400, Mark Phippard said:
> >
> > >Homebrew and MacPorts are both listed.
> >
> > I saw that, but I thought they required Xcode...
> >
> > >Honestly once th
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 7:17 PM Sean McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:07:04 -0400, Mark Phippard said:
>
> >Homebrew and MacPorts are both listed.
>
> I saw that, but I thought they required Xcode...
>
> >Honestly once those projects
> >supported SVN it kind of removed all of the incentive t
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 09:07:04 -0400, Mark Phippard said:
>Homebrew and MacPorts are both listed.
I saw that, but I thought they required Xcode...
>Honestly once those projects
>supported SVN it kind of removed all of the incentive to publish a
>package. That is why we stopped providing one from Co
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 8:54 AM Sean McBride wrote:
> Alas, that seems to mean there are no other binary distributions for macOS,
> unless anyone knows of any?
Homebrew and MacPorts are both listed. Honestly once those projects
supported SVN it kind of removed all of the incentive to publish a
p
28 matches
Mail list logo
