Stefan Hett wrote on Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 19:03:08 +0200:
> It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's
> possible to do with SVN are merges like these:
>
> merge A/B/somefile into A
That surprises me. We have a similar validation for 'switch' that
enforces the source and tar
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Stefan Hett wrote:
> It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's possible
> to do with SVN are merges like these:
>
> merge A/B/somefile into A
>
> absolutely valid operation, but nothing we use here. In cases this is done
> here in our co
It does and that's not quite the problem for me. However what's possible
to do with SVN are merges like these:
merge A/B/somefile into A
absolutely valid operation, but nothing we use here. In cases this is
done here in our company it's always an incorrect merge (because someone
chose the wro
I was under the impression that subversion now automatically takes subtree
mergeinfo into account:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.html#svn.branchmerge.basicmerging.stayinsync.subtree
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Hett [mailto:ste...@egosoft.com]
