RE: default ignores

2012-05-01 Thread James French
Sorry for late reply - thanks for that information Johan. Glad that there's work going on in this area :) -Original Message- From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 April 2012 16:32 To: James French Cc: Les Mikesell; Subversion Users Subject: Re: default ignore

Re: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James French wrote: > > > From: Les Mikesell [lesmikes...@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 April 2012 19:34 > To: James French > Cc: Subversion Users > Subject: Re: default ignores > > On Tue, Apr 17, 20

Re: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 17, 2012, at 13:34, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French wrote: >> >> I would say that it is up to the user to check their commit and if it >> contains unwanted files then that fact should be visible to them and they >> can un-add them and set up an ignore

RE: default ignores

2012-04-18 Thread James French
From: Les Mikesell [lesmikes...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 April 2012 19:34 To: James French Cc: Subversion Users Subject: Re: default ignores On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French wrote: > > I would say that it is up to the user to check their

Re: default ignores

2012-04-17 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James French wrote: > > I would say that it is up to the user to check their commit and if it > contains unwanted files then that fact should be visible to them and they can > un-add them and set up an ignore if appropriate. Sorry, but no. A user can't ever un-

RE: default ignores

2012-04-17 Thread James French
-Original Message- From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] Sent: 17 April 2012 16:57 To: James French Cc: Subversion Users Subject: Re: default ignores On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:18 AM, James French wrote: > Hi group, > > > > Just wanted to have a bit of

Re: default ignores

2012-04-17 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:18 AM, James French wrote: > Hi group, > > > > Just wanted to have a bit of rant about the default ignores that subversion > clients have since its cost us so much time and hassle. I would like to > argue that there should be no default ignores – let the client (customer