Out of curiosity, I built the 1.7.0 rc3 that's currently in
preparation and tried it on both systems. The EXT4 system managed 200
revisions in the time it took the BTRFS system to complete 70, so the
EXT4 system is about 3x faster for this particular test. It appears as
if the server-side changes i
1.7 includes performance optimizations by Stefan2, new cache modules,
new cache users, etc.
branches/performance includes, among other things, a file handles cache
for FSFS. The plan is to merge that for 1.8.
branches/revprop-packing packs revprops into flat files (not to sqlite).
A basic form c
I'm using 1.6.x. I wasn't aware that there'd been sufficient
server-side work in 1.7.x as to make this distinction important.
// ben
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 16:12, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> You haven't mentioned what version of svn you use. As you say, there
> has been work recently --- some of it
You haven't mentioned what version of svn you use. As you say, there
has been work recently --- some of it is in 1.7, some of it is on
^/subversion/branches/performance, some of it is on
^/subversion/branches/revprop-packing, and some additional ideas
are in notes/fsfs-improvements.txt in trunk.
