Matt Hargett wrote on Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 20:01:05 +:
> What other things would you like to discuss or have me research?
Sorry, I don't have time at the moment to look into this further. In
the meantime I suggest you take this thread to dev@. (I might be able
to get back to this thread in t
On 2/2/13 1:51 AM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>Matt Hargett wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:04:06 +:
>> To parallel the additions of --include-externals to the 'commit' and
>>'ls'
>> commands, I would also like to propose adding the option to the 'diff'
>> command. I just tested latest trunk and
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:51:15 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Matt Hargett wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:04:06 +:
> > To parallel the additions of --include-externals to the 'commit' and 'ls'
> > commands, I would also like to propose adding the option to the 'diff'
> > command. I just tested l
Matt Hargett wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:04:06 +:
> To parallel the additions of --include-externals to the 'commit' and 'ls'
> commands, I would also like to propose adding the option to the 'diff'
> command. I just tested latest trunk and the option is unrecognized.
...
> Let me know wha
+0
(sounds like a good idea on the surface, but I didn't consider the
details and I won't be the one implementing it)
Matt Hargett wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:04:06 +:
> To parallel the additions of --include-externals to the 'commit' and 'ls'
> commands, I would also like to propose add
