Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the explanation - I always forget about the subtleties of using
-r versus @. I now understand what Subversion is doing here and why,
but I maintain that it should give some indication that the workspace is not
pointing at the "expected" repository location. Yes, it's the res
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 07:10:47PM +1200, Fergus Slorach wrote:
>
> Checking out a copied directory at a revision prior to the copy results in
> a checkout of the data before the copy. I would expect this to fail in the
> same way that attempting to update to an invalid revision fails.
> Is this t
