Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 12, 2010, at 15:47, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/12/2010 3:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: >> >>> What should happen to things that are added to a working copy some other >>> way but aren't managed by subversion? I don't think you want them

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 3/12/2010 3:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file externals, but fo

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 12, 2010, at 14:43, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> > >> Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed >> considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file >> externals, but for this behavior of dir externals

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Les Mikesell
On 3/12/2010 2:12 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: Hi David, when I analysed externals in 1.6 about a year ago, that is what I found. I consider it a bug. Is there an entry in the issue tracker for this, if this is indeed considered a bug (I know there is one for the inability to remove file exter

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread Johan Corveleyn
gmail.com] > Sent: 12 March 2010 14:08 > To: David Aldrich > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy > > On 12 March 2010 11:28, David Aldrich wrote: >> Hi >> >> I haven't had a reply to this question of

RE: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread David Aldrich
ected Externals behaviour in working copy On 12 March 2010 11:28, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi > > I haven't had a reply to this question of mine yet. So I would like to > rephrase it: > > Is it true that if I delete an external relating to a folder or file then svn > wil

Re: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread neels
On 12 March 2010 11:28, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi > > I haven't had a reply to this question of mine yet. So I would like to > rephrase it: > > Is it true that if I delete an external relating to a folder or file then svn > will not automatically delete that folder/file from my local working cop

RE: Unexpected Externals behaviour in working copy

2010-03-12 Thread David Aldrich
Hi I haven't had a reply to this question of mine yet. So I would like to rephrase it: Is it true that if I delete an external relating to a folder or file then svn will not automatically delete that folder/file from my local working copy? This seems to be related to Subversion issue #3351 (al