Testing 1.7 pre-releases Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-08 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 11:13:05 +0200: > Doing pre-release testing is a great service to the community. > For us, it is a lot easier to handle problems before the release, > and we can respond to problem reports a lot quicker. > > After release we are bound by compatibility

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 01:56:07PM +1000, Tony Butt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 03:58 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Tony Butt wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:41:43 +1000: > > > Probably don't want to do that. > > > We are in a commercial environment, with some 20 developers relying on > > > s

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Tony Butt wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 13:56:07 +1000: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 03:58 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Tony Butt wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:41:43 +1000: > > > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 02:59 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > > This doesn't address memcached directly, but there has

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:31 -0700, Geoff Hoffman wrote: Tony - Strange results to be sure. You probably thought of all this, but... Did you check Memcached is working correctly without Subversion? Did you check the results of checking out or updating the 2

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 03:58 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Tony Butt wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:41:43 +1000: > > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 02:59 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > This doesn't address memcached directly, but there has been a /lot/ of > > > work on server-side optimization and cachi

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:31 -0700, Geoff Hoffman wrote: Tony - Strange results to be sure. You probably thought of all this, but... Did you check Memcached is working correctly without Subversion? It seems to be - reviewboard works OK, and running memcache

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Tony Butt
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 02:59 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > This doesn't address memcached directly, but there has been a /lot/ of > work on server-side optimization and caching in 1.7 (also for > non-memcached-backed caches). > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7#server-performanc

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Tony Butt wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:41:43 +1000: > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 02:59 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > This doesn't address memcached directly, but there has been a /lot/ of > > work on server-side optimization and caching in 1.7 (also for > > non-memcached-backed caches). > > > > h

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Geoff Hoffman
Tony - Strange results to be sure. You probably thought of all this, but... Did you check Memcached is working correctly without Subversion? Did you check the results of checking out or updating the 2nd or 3rd time? In other words, it may take longer the first time because every object in the repo

Re: Trials with memcached

2011-07-07 Thread Daniel Shahaf
This doesn't address memcached directly, but there has been a /lot/ of work on server-side optimization and caching in 1.7 (also for non-memcached-backed caches). http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7#server-performance-tuning You might want to take 1.7.0-alpha3 for a spin... Tony