On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
>
>> I think the only way SVN can come close to acceptable performance
>> for
>> this use case (large file, lots of revs) would be to precompute and
>> cache that data on the server side, so it has the data ready like
>> CVS
>> does. If anyone woul
> I think the only way SVN can come close to acceptable performance
> for
> this use case (large file, lots of revs) would be to precompute and
> cache that data on the server side, so it has the data ready like
> CVS
> does. If anyone would implement this, I for one would be very happy
> :D.
tor
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>> Anyway, I can understand Andreas' desire to clean out old history
>> that's no longer needed, and that's only slowing things down. But
>> sometimes, having that entire history is very useful, so we chose not
>> to do that. Instead, we learne
> Anyway, I can understand Andreas' desire to clean out old history
> that's no longer needed, and that's only slowing things down. But
> sometimes, having that entire history is very useful, so we chose not
> to do that. Instead, we learned to live with the current limitations
> for now, and we ho
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:31, Andreas Hoegger wrote:
>
>> Yes I do. You can imagine if 150 developers have been working for 5 years
>> nobody will use 'blame'/'annotate' commands except for you feel infinitely
>> bored at least with version 1.4
On Jan 6, 2010, at 12:31, Andreas Hoegger wrote:
> Yes I do. You can imagine if 150 developers have been working for 5 years
> nobody will use 'blame'/'annotate' commands except for you feel infinitely
> bored at least with version 1.4 (it would take hours). Is there really nobody
> having the
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Andreas Hoegger
wrote:
> Hi all,
> We have been using SVN for years. Our repositories raised in size over the
> years. To get our repositories easier to maintain/backup we are looking for a
> possibility to get rid of unused old revisions.
You're awa
On Jan 6, 2010, at 06:28, Andreas Hoegger wrote:
> We have been using SVN for years. Our repositories raised in size over the
> years. To get our repositories easier to maintain/backup we are looking for a
> possibility to get rid of unused old revisions.
>
> E.g. Out of a repository of 10'00
