On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:14 PM jackson wrote:
>
> HI Mark ,
>
> Thank you so much , i will enable the debug mode and do the testing and let
> you know once done.
I would suggest taking a look at the Apache error.log once you do as
it will grow very fast. The LDAP module logs a fair amount and
HI Mark ,
Thank you so much , i will enable the debug mode and do the testing and
let you know once done.
Thanks & Regards,
Jackson J
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:35 PM Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:49 AM jackson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > We are using subversion 1.7 v
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:49 AM jackson wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often when
> the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error and
> the user is getting locked out. The users are authenticated via LDAP.
>
> A
Hi Nathan,
Yes, we are building a new subversion server with version 1.10.
We have been facing this issue for the past 3-4 months and Meanwhile, is
there any performance tuning that can be done to fix this issue till the
migration is completed ?
Thanks & Regards,
Jackson J
On Fri, May 21,
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:48 AM jackson wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often when
> the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error and
> the user is getting locked out. The users are authenticated via LDAP.
>
> At
Yes, I succeeded by following the link that was sent with the configure
option.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Benson, hi. Did you ever get Subversion 1.7 working well on RHEL or
> CentOS 4.x? I took a glance back at my old RPM building tools for
> Subversion 1.6
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:43 AM, vishwajeet singh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently upgraded from subversion server from 1.6 to 1.7, everything
> works fine for 1.6 client and 1.7 server.
> But when I upgrade to 1.7 client my commit fails with following error
>
> *svn: E160013: Commit failed (detail
Philip Martin writes:
> vishwajeet singh writes:
>
>> As thread it's not just with mod_wsgi, problem persist with fcgi, can you
>> please elaborate on reordering I tried moving wsgi module at end but that
>> did not help.
>
> Reordering may not work; it depends how the other modules work. Fixin
vishwajeet singh writes:
> As thread it's not just with mod_wsgi, problem persist with fcgi, can you
> please elaborate on reordering I tried moving wsgi module at end but that
> did not help.
Reordering may not work; it depends how the other modules work. Fixing
it may require code changes in
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> vishwajeet singh writes:
>
> >> > *svn: E160013: Commit failed (details follow):*
> >> > *svn: E160013: '/svn/RDR/!svn/me' path not found*
> >
> >> "SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround.
> >>
> >> Note that there are known issu
vishwajeet singh writes:
>> > *svn: E160013: Commit failed (details follow):*
>> > *svn: E160013: '/svn/RDR/!svn/me' path not found*
>
>> "SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround.
>>
>> Note that there are known issues with httpd-2.4 support in svn with bdb
>> repositories.
>
> I could
"SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround.
Note that there are known issues with httpd-2.4 support in svn with bdb
repositories.
vishwajeet singh wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:13:16 +0530:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently upgraded from subversion server from 1.6 to 1.7, everything
> works f
I opened # 4120.
The ticket does not contain a script, but reproduction should be simple enough,
I hope I provided all the necessary info.
If not, I can send you the complete repo (contains only testing data).
* Daniel Shahaf :
>
> At a guess the problem here is that 'status' dereferences the sym
At a guess the problem here is that 'status' dereferences the symlink
when it shouldn't or didn't, so I don't think this is related to #4091.
Could you file a new issue for this? And, if possible, provide
a reproduction script.
Thanks,
Daniel
Fridtjof Busse wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 16:02
2012/2/7 Miroslav Friš :
> Hello,
>
> I tried to upgrade Apache SVN on Synology Linux using IPKG tool. It reported
> the latest version 1.6.17. Will be the newest version available for the ipkg
> as well ?
The Subversion project does not distribute binary releases. You'll
need to ask whoever creat
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:34:03 +0200:
> Am 18.10.2011 10:02, schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
> >Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200:
> >! is special in unix shells. But ^./ for the wc root?
>
> The caret ("^") is special in other shells, namely cmd.exe. Als
Am 18.10.2011 10:02, schrieb Daniel Shahaf:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200:
! is special in unix shells. But ^./ for the wc root?
The caret ("^") is special in other shells, namely cmd.exe. Also, wasn't
the caret already used to refer to the repository root?
Ul
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:33:38PM +, Ann Friauf wrote:
> I upgraded to Subversion 1.7. I installed the Subversion 1.7 command line
> client and TortoiseSVN 1.7. I successfully upgraded the working copy on
> several folders. On the last one, after doing the upgrade, it shows 2
> modification
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200:
> That said, maybe there is room for a general enhancement (for a future
> svn version), to have some kind of alias to mean "working copy root".
> Like the '^', which means repository root. Of course, there is always
> the problem of dif
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Talden wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>>> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just
>>>
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just
>> >> switch the containing working copy when you're in
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> > >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just
> > >> switch the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
> > >
> > > See http://svn.h
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just
> >> switch the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
> >
> > See http://svn.haxx.se/users
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:20:05PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to n
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:12:55 +0200:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> > Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
> > the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
>
> See http://svn.haxx.se/users/arc
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:20:05PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
> >> the containing working copy when you're in
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
>> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
>> the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
>
> See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-201
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote:
> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch
> the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it?
See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-10/0134.shtml
On Tuesday 22 February 2011, Waseem Bokhari wrote:
> I have read out a lot for Subversion 1.7 ; Can
> you guys share when does it release for us?
Take a look at Subversion's roadmap.
Uli
--
ML: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/mailing-lists.html
FAQ: http://subversion.apache.or
29 matches
Mail list logo
