RE: SVN question

2011-05-24 Thread Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO)
...@hp.com] Gesendet: Montag, 23. Mai 2011 22:54 An: Varnau, Steve (Neoview); users@subversion.apache.org Betreff: RE: SVN question Steve, Thank you for taking the time. I also saw thisI was wondering what users do to get something similar working. The same thing happens under Perforce.  The

Re: SVN question

2011-05-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org > > Subject: Re: SVN question > > > > 'svn up nonexistent' will pull in a file (inappropriately) called > > 'nonexistent' that has been created on the server in a revision newer > > than the BASE revision of t

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO)
aniel Shahaf Cc: Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN question > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:37 PM > To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview) > Cc: Hahn, Christophe

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:37 PM > To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview) > Cc: Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: SVN question > > 'svn up non

Re: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO) > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:54 PM > To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview); users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: SVN question > > Steve, > > Thank you for taking the time. > > I also saw thisI was wondering what users do to get s

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO)
Steve, This is useful. I will keep an open mind. Thank you, Chris From: Varnau, Steve (Neoview) Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 2:30 PM To: Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN question svn does not always return success. For instance: > svn ls svn: &#x

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
onday, May 23, 2011 1:54 PM To: Varnau, Steve (Neoview); users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN question Steve, Thank you for taking the time. I also saw thisI was wondering what users do to get something similar working. The same thing happens under Perforce. The command "p4&qu

Re: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Andy Levy
er (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: RE: SVN question > > > > Christopher, > > > > The problem is not with your perl code. Apparently, update returns success if > you give it a path that does not exist in the current working directory. > > >

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO)
that I expect. Take care, Christopher From: Varnau, Steve (Neoview) Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 1:33 PM To: Hahn, Christopher (SAN DIEGO); users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN question Christopher, The problem is not with your perl code. Apparently, update returns success if you give it

RE: SVN question

2011-05-23 Thread Varnau, Steve (Neoview)
Christopher, The problem is not with your perl code. Apparently, update returns success if you give it a path that does not exist in the current working directory. Ø svn update foobar At revision 3158. Ø echo $? 0 For Svn 1.6.15, anyway. Seems to hold for linux & windows. -Steve From: H