Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Hello Daniel, We have checked from below link but not find the solution. If we create a new repository named as *Utilities *that repository is getting created but when user is trying to login that repository by using URL as - *svn://192.168.213.190/SVN/Utilities

Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Den mån 27 maj 2024 kl 14:50 skrev Roshan Pardeshi < roshan.parde...@ncdex.com>: > Hello Daniel, > > We are using below mentioned path for access in SVN through > TortoiseSVN->Repo Browser. > > svn://___.__.__.___(server ip)/SVN/aedge > So you are using svnserve. Can you double check your settin

Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Hello Daniel, We are using below mentioned path for access in SVN through TortoiseSVN->Repo Browser. svn://___.__.__.___(server ip)/SVN/aedge Regards,

Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Den tors 23 maj 2024 kl 18:03 skrev Roshan Pardeshi < roshan.parde...@ncdex.com>: > Hello Team, > > Please find the my input inline below. > > Which protocol are you using to access the repository? - Tortoise SVN - > Repo Browser > Are you using Apache/mod_dav_svn (http[s]://..), svnserve (sv

Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Hello Team, Please find the my input inline below. Which protocol are you using to access the repository? - Tortoise SVN - Repo Browser Do you have other repositories where this works? - No Can you share your server configuration? - its a Redhat Linux with 16 GB RAM and 4 core CPU. Regards,

Re: SVN issue - Repository - not able to login

Den tors 23 maj 2024 kl 16:07 skrev Roshan Pardeshi < roshan.parde...@ncdex.com>: > Hi All, > > We are not getting Authentication window(using TortoriseSVN Repo Browser) > after creating a new repository in SVN to access that repository > > Else if we are getting authentication window then after

Re: SVN issue

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Pavel Lyalyakin < pavel.lyalya...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:32 PM, vellur pandian R K > wrote: > > Use "Reply All" command of your email client to keep the mailing list > in the loop, please. BTW, the mailing list prefers bottom

Re: SVN issue

Hello, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:32 PM, vellur pandian R K wrote: Use "Reply All" command of your email client to keep the mailing list in the loop, please. BTW, the mailing list prefers bottom posting or inline replying instead of top-posing. > Hi Pavel, > >Thanks for the reply, Right now

Re: SVN issue

vellur pandian R K wrote on Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 15:00:09 +0530: > * Verified revision 508451. > svnadmin: E160004: Mergeinfo-count discrepancy on 'a-1.0.r508452/9674': > expected > 1244741480414057964+0, counted 116 This looks like issue #4129: https://subversion.apache.org/docs/issue4129.t

Re: SVN issue

Hello, On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:30 PM, vellur pandian R K wrote: > > Hi > > We are using Visual SVN server in our company. It worked well What VisualSVN Server version do you use at the moment? Make sure that you use an up-to-date VisualSVN Server version. > But users unable to create parti

Re: SVN Issue while connecting to the repository

Hi,   > Recently we have installed SVN in a new windows server. > Migrated and loaded the users repositories in the new SVN server. > I could able to access those repositories.  > Created users, but could not able to access those repository, > login is not accepting and it prompts continuously. No

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

>I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with >thousands of transactions, and you're doing a raw file-system based >rsync? What is raw file-system based rsync ? Can you shed some light on it? >Make sure you have rsync version 3.x, to start with, and *do not* try >to run it ove

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Mohsin wrote: >>Assume you realize that rsync is not part of Subversion? > > Yes rsync is separate utility which is used for syncing purpose . Rsync > nothing to do with subversion. I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with thousands of tran

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

>Subversion's SPARC Solaris buildbot slave is a T1000. It takes about >6min to build Subversion and 25min to run the regression tests on a RAM >disk. By way of comparison, my Linux desktop is about one year old and a >similar build is less than 30sec and the tests take less than 3min. The >regres

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

Thanks for your suggestion at least you have provided me a guide : ) Regards Mohsin On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote: > > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > > posting these

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote: > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > posting these machines were not >good with SVN. > > If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are working > fine with svn . I think we should

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

Mark Phippard writes: > I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > posting these machines were not good with SVN. Aren't these the ones > capable of running a lot of threads but are very slow single thread > machines? The processor is only like 1 Ghz I believe. > >

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

>I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people posting these machines were not >good with SVN. If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are working fine with svn . I think we should prefer Linux machines for svn. Mohsin -- View this message i

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

>Assume you realize that rsync is not part of Subversion? Yes rsync is separate utility which is used for syncing purpose . Rsync nothing to do with subversion. -- View this message in context: http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/SVN-Issue-On-Solaris-OS-tp191202p191210.html Sent from the

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On Dec 10, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mohsin wrote: >> This really shouldn't matter, unless you now have a directory with tens >> of thousands of entries in it. And your use of the term "100% disk >> usage" seems to be about I/O, not capacity (which is quite strange). On >> the other hand, if you're actua

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

>This really shouldn't matter, unless you now have a directory with tens >of thousands of entries in it. And your use of the term "100% disk >usage" seems to be about I/O, not capacity (which is quite strange). On >the other hand, if you're actually rsyncing lots of data to or from your >machine, i

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On 10.12.2014 22:37, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > > > This thing is very strange for me because svn should work > properly on > > Solaris machine because that machin

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > > > This thing is very strange for me because svn should work properly on > > Solaris machine because that machine have better specs but result is > > opposite. > > What are "better specs", exactly? It's n

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > Good Day SVN Experts, > > I recently upgraded svn v 1.8.9 to v 1.8.10 from Linux OS to Solaris OS. > Linux machine was desktop machine with low specs and Solaris machine is > T1000 server class machine. Now issue we faced is when we start rsync from > Solaris ma

RE: SVN issue

@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: SVN issue On 30 March 2014 15:28, Omer Abramovich mailto:om...@syverse.net>> wrote: Hello, After setting up SVN protocol (using svnserve windows process) I get this kind of error when perform commit. Hi Omer, This issue is fixed in recently released VisualSVN Server

Re: SVN issue

On 30 March 2014 15:28, Omer Abramovich wrote: > Hello, > > > > After setting up SVN protocol (using svnserve windows process) I get this > kind of error when perform commit. > > > Hi Omer, This issue is fixed in recently released VisualSVN Server 2.7.5: * Fixed: VisualSVNServerHooks.exe crashe

RE: SVN issue

Got it, thank you Bert. Regards, Omer Abramovich IS/ITDepartment Mobile 052.8588.111 [Syverse Logo] From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 11:41 AM To: Omer Abramovich; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: SVN issue Looking at

RE: SVN issue

Looking at the log, the crash is in 'VisualSVNServerHooks.exe', so I would recommend mailing to the VisualSVN support e-mail list. I don't think we know how to help you here. Bert From: Omer Abramovich [mailto:om...@syverse.net] Sent: zondag 30 maart 2014 13:29 To: users@su

Re: svn issue

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Amit Kumar [IN7537] wrote: > > Thanks for reply. But in my condition there are 77 items are in parent folder > which is group of project and some other folder like image location, document > location. All project folder is required except like documents and image

Re: svn issue

...@gmail.com Subject: Re: svn issue On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Amit Kumar [IN7537] wrote: I found an issue in SVN. Suppose there are 10 project is in directory. And I want to update only 9 project. There is no option to lock one project not to update. By this issue I get problem. I will

Re: svn issue

On May 9, 2013, at 00:16, Amit Kumar wrote: > Thanks for reply. But in my condition there are 77 items are in parent folder > which is group of project and some other folder like image location, document > location. All project folder is required except like documents and image > folder. > so

RE: svn issue

- From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 7:22 PM To: Amit Kumar [IN7537] Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; amitsinghra...@gmail.com Subject: Re: svn issue On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Amit Kumar [IN7537] wrote: > > I found an issue in SVN. S

RE: svn issue

You can do a fresh checkout and not include project10 in the initial update: svn co -N svn://.../top_dir cd top_dir cd svn update project1 project2 ... project 9 Future 'svn update' commands in the top_dir directory will only update projects 1 through 9. Or you can explicitly not update project 1

Re: svn issue

On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Amit Kumar [IN7537] wrote: > > I found an issue in SVN. Suppose there are 10 project is in directory. And I > want to update only 9 project. There is no option to lock one project not to > update. > > By this issue I get problem. I will request you to solve this iss