Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-12 Thread Mohsin Abbas
>I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with >thousands of transactions, and you're doing a raw file-system based >rsync? What is raw file-system based rsync ? Can you shed some light on it? >Make sure you have rsync version 3.x, to start with, and *do not* try >to run it ove

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-11 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Mohsin wrote: >>Assume you realize that rsync is not part of Subversion? > > Yes rsync is separate utility which is used for syncing purpose . Rsync > nothing to do with subversion. I'm assuming that this bulky repository has a long history, with thousands of tran

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mohsin
>Subversion's SPARC Solaris buildbot slave is a T1000. It takes about >6min to build Subversion and 25min to run the regression tests on a RAM >disk. By way of comparison, my Linux desktop is about one year old and a >similar build is less than 30sec and the tests take less than 3min. The >regres

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mohsin Abbas
Thanks for your suggestion at least you have provided me a guide : ) Regards Mohsin On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote: > > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > > posting these

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:01:10PM -0700, Mohsin wrote: > >I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > posting these machines were not >good with SVN. > > If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are working > fine with svn . I think we should

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Philip Martin
Mark Phippard writes: > I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people > posting these machines were not good with SVN. Aren't these the ones > capable of running a lot of threads but are very slow single thread > machines? The processor is only like 1 Ghz I believe. > >

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mohsin
>I searched the archives without luck, but thought I recall some people posting these machines were not >good with SVN. If this is the case then we should consider Linux machines which are working fine with svn . I think we should prefer Linux machines for svn. Mohsin -- View this message i

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mohsin
>Assume you realize that rsync is not part of Subversion? Yes rsync is separate utility which is used for syncing purpose . Rsync nothing to do with subversion. -- View this message in context: http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/SVN-Issue-On-Solaris-OS-tp191202p191210.html Sent from the

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mark Phippard
On Dec 10, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Mohsin wrote: >> This really shouldn't matter, unless you now have a directory with tens >> of thousands of entries in it. And your use of the term "100% disk >> usage" seems to be about I/O, not capacity (which is quite strange). On >> the other hand, if you're actua

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mohsin
>This really shouldn't matter, unless you now have a directory with tens >of thousands of entries in it. And your use of the term "100% disk >usage" seems to be about I/O, not capacity (which is quite strange). On >the other hand, if you're actually rsyncing lots of data to or from your >machine, i

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.12.2014 22:37, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Branko Čibej > wrote: > > On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > > > This thing is very strange for me because svn should work > properly on > > Solaris machine because that machin

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > > > This thing is very strange for me because svn should work properly on > > Solaris machine because that machine have better specs but result is > > opposite. > > What are "better specs", exactly? It's n

Re: SVN Issue On Solaris OS

2014-12-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.12.2014 22:01, Mohsin wrote: > Good Day SVN Experts, > > I recently upgraded svn v 1.8.9 to v 1.8.10 from Linux OS to Solaris OS. > Linux machine was desktop machine with low specs and Solaris machine is > T1000 server class machine. Now issue we faced is when we start rsync from > Solaris ma