On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:19 AM, i_maliavko wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using it since official release. And decision to using it was my big
> fail. Becase:
> 1. commit list makes about 10 minutes time after time;
> 2. first update in day last over 15 minutes;
Hard to say whether this is a regression, wi
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:19 AM, i_maliavko wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using it since official release. And decision to using it was my big
> fail. Becase:
> 1. commit list makes about 10 minutes time after time;
> 2. first update in day last over 15 minutes;
>
> I'm working on big project (over 100 000
Am 03.11.2011 12:31, schrieb Tomáš Klinkovský:
My server is also very old:
$ svn --version
svn, version 1.0.9 (r11378)
compiled Oct 14 2004, 10:04:20
Hehe, that's actually a proof that the SVN team's been doing a pretty
good job maintaining compatibility. Seven years without a glitch, it
see
Tomáš Klinkovský writes:
> My server is also very old:
>
> $ svn --version
> svn, version 1.0.9 (r11378)
> compiled Oct 14 2004, 10:04:20
>
> But I don't access it through Apache, I have the Subversion daemon
> running and I use the "svn:" protocol.
>
> Can I provide any other help?
I can
Philip Martin wrote:
Tomáš Klinkovský writes:
starting from svn 1.7 I cannot make "svn update" anymore on Windows
7, 64bit.
C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn --version
svn, version 1.7.1-SlikSvn-1.7.1-X64 (SlikSvn/1.7.1) X64
compiled Oct 26 2011, 14:18:24
C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>
Tomáš Klinkovský writes:
> starting from svn 1.7 I cannot make "svn update" anymore on Windows 7,
> 64bit.
>
> C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn --version
> svn, version 1.7.1-SlikSvn-1.7.1-X64 (SlikSvn/1.7.1) X64
> compiled Oct 26 2011, 14:18:24
>
> C:\Users\tomas\Documents\xxx>svn update
>
