Am 01.03.2010 20:35, schrieb Pacco:
> Hi David,
>
> I'm very thankful about your brief response and the many ideas and
Sorry, should of course be 'elaborated', not 'brief'.
Hi Ben,
thank you for your response. After one additional day of thinking about
this issue I am near to a concluĊion that I'm on the wrong way fixing
problems of the work-flow process by abusing the VCS.
The problem is that I'm heavily tighten by political issues and
decissions that makes it
Hi David,
I'm very thankful about your brief response and the many ideas and
thoughts you provided. In many cases you mentioned about choosing better
ways I absolutely agree with you. But unfortunately it is not up to me
to decide things like selecting the VCS or the underlying tools. There
a
Consider the popularity of Subversion, I'd definitely count it as one
of the big boys. Unlike most other packages, Subversion versions the
changes to the repository rather than individual files. This can seem
confusing at first. You have a file that's been changed twice, but
somehow you can refer t
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 21:33, Pacco wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm responsible for the content of a single package within a bigger software
> (several million lines of code). I'm experienced with ClearCase, Dimensions,
> CVS, git, mercurial, etc.
> Now, management decision was made to use Subversion over o
