On Aug 12, 2015, at 4:00, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Yay for misunderstandings. :)
>
> The problem with HFS is that it normalizes paths: regardless of how your
> file names are (de)normalised when you create them, they're stored in
> HFS in NFD form.
I don't think I misunderstood anything; I said
On 12.08.2015 00:11, Dave Huang wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 15:35, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 10.08.2015 18:46, Attila Soki wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> i saw the entry "reimplement UTF-8 fuzzy conversion using utf8proc
>>> (r1511676)"
>>> in the changelog and hoped this would be the fix for
>>> http:/
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Dave Huang wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 15:35, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> >
>> > On 10.08.2015 18:46, Attila Soki wrote:
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> i saw the entry "reimplement UTF-8 fuzzy conversion using
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Dave Huang wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 15:35, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >
> > On 10.08.2015 18:46, Attila Soki wrote:
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> i saw the entry "reimplement UTF-8 fuzzy conversion using utf8proc
> >> (r1511676)"
> >> in the changelog and hoped thi
On Aug 11, 2015, at 15:35, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> On 10.08.2015 18:46, Attila Soki wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> i saw the entry "reimplement UTF-8 fuzzy conversion using utf8proc
>> (r1511676)"
>> in the changelog and hoped this would be the fix for
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?i
On 10.08.2015 18:46, Attila Soki wrote:
> hi,
>
> i saw the entry "reimplement UTF-8 fuzzy conversion using utf8proc (r1511676)"
> in the changelog and hoped this would be the fix for
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2464
>
> but after a quick test it seems to be still broken.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.props.special.ignore.html
>>
>> In summary: this is a way to tell svn to ignore a file (or filename pattern)
>> when looking for files to check-in. Hence the file itself is not in the
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Cooke, Mark wrote:
> [Please post inline, it makes it easier to follow...]
>
>> Message original ----
>> Sujet: Re: Question about subversion
>> De : Cooke, Mark
>> Pour : Marc Davenne , Andrew Reedick
>>
>&
[Please post inline, it makes it easier to follow...]
> Message original
> Sujet: Re: Question about subversion
> De : Cooke, Mark
> Pour : Marc Davenne , Andrew Reedick
>
> Copie à : "users@subversion.apache.org"
> Date : 27/06/2013 11:4
I am not sure I understand it very well. When you say it is ignored,
does it mean it is on svn ?
And what is this script that would trigger on checkout ?
Can you explain it again ?
Message original
Sujet: Re: Question about subversion
De : Cooke, Mark
Pour : Marc Davenne
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr]
> Sent: 27 June 2013 10:25
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question about subversion
>
> Thank you for your answers... all of you
>
> @A
ement.
Typically I would not put it on svn because everybody has different
ones... but how to I version the param file (without it the application
does not work)
Message original
Sujet: Re: Question about subversion
De : Andrew Reedick
Pour : Marc Davenne ,
2013/6/26 Marc Davenne :
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to
> tell me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you
> see more files that should not be there, tell me and why.
>
> Files
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Question about subversion
>
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
I think the previous response was quite correct, it mostly all depends.
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like you to
> tell
> me if you agree. If you dont agree can you tell me why please. If you see more
> files th
Guten Tag Marc Davenne,
am Mittwoch, 26. Juni 2013 um 16:36 schrieben Sie:
> Files who should not be on SVN :
>
> files automatically generated
This depends on the files which get automatically generated and their
purpose: It's perfectly valid to version automatically generated
Guten Tag Wolfgang Stengel,
am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013 um 08:51 schrieben Sie:
> The version is 3.6.3, however I think all these requests
> originate from the Subversion client itself... is it known why
> these two files are checked repeatedly although they do not
> exist (at this tim
Hi Andy,
Am 12.03.2013 18:44, schrieb Andy Levy:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Wolfgang Stengel
mailto:wolfgang.sten...@efactory.de>>
wrote:
Hello list,
since a couple of weeks commits from a Windows system in a Samba
shared WC take much longer than before (using Windows 7,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Wolfgang Stengel <
wolfgang.sten...@efactory.de> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> since a couple of weeks commits from a Windows system in a Samba shared WC
> take much longer than before (using Windows 7, Subversion client 1.7.8).
>
> I tracked this down to Subversion ac
19 matches
Mail list logo
