On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Jacob Weber wrote:
> Stein Somers:
> > I see some self-refenertial mergeinfo in our /trunk, after lots of
> > merges to and from. Maybe I explicitly added it with a record-only in
> > some state of confusion. But it doesn't scare me at all. It would only
> > matte
Stein Somers:
> I see some self-refenertial mergeinfo in our /trunk, after lots of
> merges to and from. Maybe I explicitly added it with a record-only in
> some state of confusion. But it doesn't scare me at all. It would only
> matter if you explicitly merged /trunk to /trunk. And then, as far
Maybe the self-referential mergeinfo I saw was being introduced some other way.
I see some self-refenertial mergeinfo in our /trunk, after lots of
merges to and from. Maybe I explicitly added it with a record-only in
some state of confusion. But it doesn't scare me at all. It would only
matte
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:20:10AM -0800, Jacob Weber wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Jacob Weber wrote:
> >> Let's say I have a branch where I develop two features, X and Y. I then
> >> want to merge only X back
> >> into the trunk. I want to do some further development on Y, and mer
On Feb 18, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Jacob Weber wrote:
>> Let's say I have a branch where I develop two features, X and Y. I then want
>> to merge only X back
>> into the trunk. I want to do some further development on Y, and merge it
>> into tr
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Jacob Weber wrote:
> Let's say I have a branch where I develop two features, X and Y. I then want
> to merge only X back
> into the trunk. I want to do some further development on Y, and merge it into
> trunk later.
>
> Is this possible with Subversion?
Yes. Wh
