Re: Mail-Copies-To

2010-11-19 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Gary wrote: > Cooke, Mark wrote: >>> -Original Message- >> The short answer is that if a "standard" email client (for me, m$ >> outlook) > > I'm sorry. According to every other poster you are only allowed to use > things which are specified in an RFC. Dump

RE: Mail-Copies-To

2010-11-19 Thread Tony Sweeney
rs by default as they are not part of an approved standard. Tony. > -Original Message- > From: Gary [mailto:subversion-u...@garydjones.name] > Sent: 19 November 2010 11:19 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mail-Copies-To > > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >

RE: Mail-Copies-To

2010-11-19 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Andy Levy [mailto:andy.l...@gmail.com] > Sent: 19 November 2010 11:28 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mail-Copies-To > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:19, Gary > wrote: > > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > &g

Re: Mail-Copies-To

2010-11-19 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Gary wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> If you don't wish to receive copies of replies on the list, one possible >> solution is to set the Reply-To header of your outgoing mail to the >> list's address. > > Mail-Followup-To was also set. So? Could you be a little

Re: Mail-Copies-To

2010-11-19 Thread Andy Levy
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 06:19, Gary wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> If you don't wish to receive copies of replies on the list, one possible >> solution is to set the Reply-To header of your outgoing mail to the >> list's address. > > Mail-Followup-To was also set. > I can't find where this is

Re: Mail-Copies-To (was: Re: Can't see the wood for the trees)

2010-11-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Nov 19, 2010, at 03:06, Gary wrote: > I'd have appreciated it even more if you had > followed the "Mail-Copies-To: never" header. I cannot find any RFC specifying that header. All I can find is the "Mail-Copies-To Draft" from 1999, and it seems to apply only to NNTP newsreaders. In fact it