On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:54:29AM -0500, Thomas S. Trias wrote:
> I will gladly lend time and energy as available; I envision even
> more affected commands, such as info and ls for their last committed
> revision calculation.
Great, that's very much appreciated!
If you haven't done so, you might
: Re: Log excluding svn:mergeinfo changes
From: Stefan Sperling
To: eg
Cc: "Thomas S. Trias" , users@subversion.apache.org
Date: 3/17/2010 5:05 AM
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:26:47PM -0700, eg wrote:
On 3/15/2010 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
There is an experimental branc
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:26:47PM -0700, eg wrote:
> On 3/15/2010 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> >There is an experimental branch which is aimed at implementing
> >what you need:
> >http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/ignore-mergeinfo/BRANCH-README
> >
> >I don't know what th
On 3/15/2010 9:12 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
There is an experimental branch which is aimed at implementing
what you need:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/ignore-mergeinfo/BRANCH-README
I don't know what the status of this branch is, though.
It looks like work on it has been
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:48:13AM -0500, Thomas S. Trias wrote:
> Is there a good way to get the log for a path excluding changes that
> only affected svn:mergeinfo? We have a project with several one-off
> copies of files, where changes to the copyfrom-path get merged in
> periodically. We then
